- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 12/14/18 at 7:33 pm to CamdenTiger
Yes. The bill itself was a tax bill that included market manipulation.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 8:43 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Well, Texas Judge is right. The Mandate is unconstitutional, but didn’t they argue at the Supreme Court that it wasn’t a mandate, but a tax?
Wanna have some fun? Compare this judge's forthcoming treatment in the media to that of judges that struck down Trump EOs in the last 22 months.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 8:55 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:No. They argued that the penalty for not getting it was not a fine, but was a tax. A far, far reach for John Roberts.
Well, Texas Judge is right. The Mandate is unconstitutional, but didn’t they argue at the Supreme Court that it wasn’t a mandate, but a tax?
This post was edited on 12/14/18 at 10:27 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News