- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge slaps Mueller AGAIN
Posted on 8/2/18 at 2:53 pm to brian_wilson
Posted on 8/2/18 at 2:53 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
He forged documents to show he had higher income than he did,
Just described how lending to the self employed get mortgage loans
quote:
he forged documents to indicate a loan was paid off when it wasn't, or that a property didn't have a mortgage when it did. There are paper trails on all of this including the infamous - can you covert this to a word doc for me rick? email.
On the forged documents that showed a loan was paid off, that could be slightly problematic, but the underwriter and loan officer is required to do the due diligence on all of this. If there was a mortgage, this is on the bank and the bank solely. Most banks are going to employ abstractors, etc, to comb the documents in the clerk's office. Now, if he had a mortgage under private signature (really dumb) that could be problem. Even if this was a commercial loan covered under UCC, there is a due diligence by the lending institution that would pick this up.
I would say that those that signed off on these loans have more legal liability than Manafort. Manafort has more exposure on the tax front
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News