- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA document states "Russian soldiers were turned to STONE" after Alien attack
Posted on 8/31/17 at 10:46 pm to jmarto1
Posted on 8/31/17 at 10:46 pm to jmarto1
quote:
CIA document states "Russian soldiers were turned to STONE" after Alien attack
You need to read up on the Anunnaki. IIRC, they were a race of beings that came from a planet outside of our solar system that visited the Sumerians. A lot of evidence of them that makes you wonder
There is virtually zero evidence of ancient aliens. Just evidence of ignorance about ancient history and archaeology.
Von Daniken, Hoagland, Hancock, etal are a combination of huckster and stage magician. They bring some fun,but they are also full of Shite.
3
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:06 pm to tigahbruh
I am open minded about this stuff. History is always changing as we discover more stuff. There is a lot out there we have discovered that cannot be explained in our understanding of history as it is now.
For instance, do you really believe that Puma Punku was built by the "allegedly" same stone aged natives that were found in the New World following Columbus?
The same people who never had a horse until the Spanish came to the New World and were still using bow and arrows?
If you believe that then I think you are a closed minded sheep.
History, Science, Politics and Religion should always be questioned and challenged.
Aliens, Bigfoot? I don't know. But any new knowledge that may shed some light on things we do not understand is good. If it can't be disproven, then it could become accepted History.
For instance, do you really believe that Puma Punku was built by the "allegedly" same stone aged natives that were found in the New World following Columbus?
The same people who never had a horse until the Spanish came to the New World and were still using bow and arrows?
If you believe that then I think you are a closed minded sheep.
History, Science, Politics and Religion should always be questioned and challenged.
Aliens, Bigfoot? I don't know. But any new knowledge that may shed some light on things we do not understand is good. If it can't be disproven, then it could become accepted History.
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:15 pm to tigahbruh
quote:
There is virtually zero evidence of ancient aliens
Hmmm, I wouldn't say that though a lot of it probably does fall under bs. There are legit questions as to how they built structures in such a way that we cannot recreate in modern times, or how they knew so much about our solar system.
Posted on 9/1/17 at 4:10 pm to tigahbruh
quote:
There is virtually zero evidence of ancient aliens. Just evidence of ignorance about ancient history and archaeology.
Von Daniken, Hoagland, Hancock, etal are a combination of huckster and stage magician. They bring some fun,but they are also full of Shite.
This is not true at all. There were definitely ancient aliens, it is the extent that is unknown.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News