- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
the slyest, most hilarious, nauseating, self-serving nugget of OJ parole
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm
"...I support the jury system"
Every member of the fraternity of people who have committed and gotten away with murder just winked at you, bro
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:57 pm to crescentcity
quote:
"...I support the jury system"
What was it...9 blacks, 2 Hispanics and 1 white?
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:39 pm to crescentcity
Didnt he say he had never used a weapon in an altercation with anyone before going to that hotel room during the parole hearing?
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:48 pm to AU_Right
are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:54 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?
Alan Dershowitz implied that just last night.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:55 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?
You got dam rite
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:57 pm to indianswim
Same token, will predominantly white juries let cops who gun down citizens off, or punitively punish black defendants?
There is more legal evidence (published too) to support this than just these other made up beliefs that are mainly rooted in stereotypes and perceptions of black inferiority.
It's just lazy and prejudice in the end
There is more legal evidence (published too) to support this than just these other made up beliefs that are mainly rooted in stereotypes and perceptions of black inferiority.
It's just lazy and prejudice in the end
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 pm to jorconalx
Based off what? Your prejudices ?
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 pm to crescentcity
OJ was retarded, self centered, and an a-hole today. Prison didn't change him at all. I thought they might keep him in jail since he was so defiant and unrepentant today. His attorney was a clown. It was like they didn't prep at all.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to crescentcity
quote:
"...I support the jury system"
He has a history of odd comments about juries. I remember him telling Judge Ito that he was "mindful of the mood and the stamina of this jury" to explain why he wasn't going to take the stand.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to StrongSafety
Do you think the predominantly minority jury in OJ's murder case got the decision right?!
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to StrongSafety
I can only speak for myself SS. If I'm on the jury I take my duties extremely seriously, take in the facts and evidence, and assess accordingly.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:13 pm to CheniereTiger108
quote:He believes OJ is innocent so...
Do you think the predominantly minority jury in OJ's murder case got the decision right?!
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:16 pm to CheniereTiger108
Yes I do.
The prosecution botched something that should have been easy. But they tampered with evidence, DA GETS CHARGED WITH PERJURY, and they were incredibly racist and biased. Too much legal doubt to convict him.
Now do I think he did it? Yes I do, I think he's a guilty scum bag, but the prosecution couldn't in my opinion prove beyond a responsible doubt that he did it. Must acquit
The prosecution botched something that should have been easy. But they tampered with evidence, DA GETS CHARGED WITH PERJURY, and they were incredibly racist and biased. Too much legal doubt to convict him.
Now do I think he did it? Yes I do, I think he's a guilty scum bag, but the prosecution couldn't in my opinion prove beyond a responsible doubt that he did it. Must acquit
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:16 pm to Wolfhound45
Innocent by ruling yes he is
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm to StrongSafety
A black guy that thinks OJ did it, but thinks not guilty is the right vote. Why?
Wait for it.
Racism.
Wait for it.
Racism.
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm to StrongSafety
You're correct. And will probably get down voted by people who supposedly love the Constitution.
If I'm honest, I can't rip the intelligence community and Mueller's appearance of a conflict, and somehow defend prosecutorial lack of ethics in the OJ murder trial, or the fairly stiff sentence after the initial offer in the Nevada armed robery.
If I'm honest, I can't rip the intelligence community and Mueller's appearance of a conflict, and somehow defend prosecutorial lack of ethics in the OJ murder trial, or the fairly stiff sentence after the initial offer in the Nevada armed robery.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:29 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
I think he's a guilty scum bag, but the prosecution couldn't in my opinion prove beyond a responsible doubt that he did it. Must acquit
He was guilty as sin all right.
His guilt was proven beyond any shadow of doubt - far far beyond any reasonable doubt.
This was a case of jury nullification, pure and simple. This jury knew he murdered those two people and just decided to stick it to 'the man' by letting the perp go.
There was absolutely NO DOUBT - none whatsoever - about his guilt. Sure, the prosecution was not perfect, but nothing is. Mostly they were trying to overcome what they knew to be jury bias in favor of letting him go. They knew the mood of the jury and just tried everything they could think of hoping beyond hope that some sense of justice would make it thru their skulls.
But it was certainly not the prosecution's fault that he got away with murder. With that jury, he could have confessed on the stand and they would still have let him go - because, you know, Rodney King.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:33 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Innocent by ruling yes he is
Innocence should never ever be inferred by a "not guilty" verdict.
The only exception to that would be if the defendant took the stand and successfully defended himself against all charges. Then, and only then, would I decide = "yea, he was actually innocent of the charge."
But in OJ case, innocence is complete hogwash.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News