- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Confirmed: Saints would have taken Mahomes if Lattimore was off the board
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:07 pm to drizztiger
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:07 pm to drizztiger
No. Someone they want and have valued at the pick always falls to them.
They said if they ever had a situation where no players were valued as high as the pick they would trade back. Hasn't happened in the first yet.
They said if they ever had a situation where no players were valued as high as the pick they would trade back. Hasn't happened in the first yet.
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 9:08 pm
1
Posted on 4/29/17 at 9:14 pm to bonethug0108
As per our discussion earlier this morning, I don't need you to explain the Saints thought process.
I understand the Lattimore pick. I like the Lattimore pick.
But the Saints history of being trade back averse is glaring.
And personally I don't agree with their philosophy. The deal the Brown got, moving back to #25 and getting a 1st next year is a more prudent move IMO.
I understand the Lattimore pick. I like the Lattimore pick.
But the Saints history of being trade back averse is glaring.
And personally I don't agree with their philosophy. The deal the Brown got, moving back to #25 and getting a 1st next year is a more prudent move IMO.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News