Started By
Message

re: Nick Fairley and Saints have mutual contract interests

Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:23 pm to
Posted by GMoney2600
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
14296 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:23 pm to
With the way Loomis does contracts...we would really only be forced to keep him 2 years. After that the dead money wouldn't be that big of a blow. Especially that 4th year.

We really don't have a choice though. We're most likely screwed without him in 2017.
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 4:26 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:37 pm to
We need to be all in for 2017 with Drew's comments after the season
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33995 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:38 pm to
I think it's just a combination of Fairleys history and the Saints bad luck with some Dline guys contracts in the past.

He did good last year except the penalties in the Chiefs game. I want to say he did a cheap move in the Lions game too but maybe not. His actual performance on the field isn't the problem it's just he can be a fricking dumb arse sometimes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram