- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:56 pm to The Baker
quote:
it would be beyond the limit provided by the Bekenstein bound
I was under the impression that this only applied to mechanical or electronic methods of storage?
In all seriousness though, I get that the resulting number is so large that it is one of the closest approximations of infinity that has been used, but... the universe is seemingly infinite. Which makes the number in question significantly less than even 0% of 0% of 0% of infinity. So while it is large, it is finite.
While mechanical and electronic storage are bound by the whole turing machine thing... What are the limits of biologic memory? Idk. But it seems like it is very close to a pure expression of information contained in energy. I can admit to being wrong earlier. But where's the proof?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News