Started By
Message

re: Is BR traffic really that bad?

Posted on 7/1/15 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67648 posts
Posted on 7/1/15 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

What's needed is a 6-lane loop that goes from the Basin bridge, loops below Plaquemine, crosses the river at St. Gabriel, goes through Prairieville then links up with 12 around Livingston.


I am thinking more Addis area or just above Dow for the bridge.

quote:

4 or 6-lane Nicholson/30 from LSU to this new bridge and lots of traffic that occurs because of LSU (school being in session, gameday, whatever) has a much more attractive artery to get to and from the campus (and growth is going down that way anyway, might as well feed it).


This
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
52953 posts
Posted on 7/1/15 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

I am thinking more Addis area or just above Dow for the bridge.


I think a bridge in Addis is a great idea, but not for a loop bridge. LA 1 traffic from Plaquemine to I10 has been bad for decades and a bridge in Addis would be perfect for getting some of it across the river. The problem is that it would still have to contend with the flow-through interstate traffic and in 20-30 years another bridge (or some other solution) would be needed.

The way the planning has gone, growth happens then they put in/expand roads to try and meet what's already there. Instead of doing that again, a loop that goes through more undeveloped land in directions where growth is already going puts the horse in front of the wagon for the first time in a loooong time. Instead of reacting to growth, the infrastructure would be guiding it.
This post was edited on 7/1/15 at 1:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram