- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I will never understand why Ayn Rand is so admired by my fellow conservatives
Posted on 9/28/14 at 4:36 am
Posted on 9/28/14 at 4:36 am
Aside from the fact that she hated conservatism, let us remember that much of her philosophy actually was the opposite of conservatism.
1) Ayn Rand despised altruism, yet an important tenet of conservatism is the admiration of voluntary charity, community, and association.
2) Ayn Rand believed men were able to achieve perfection (her definition of a perfect person was one who simply used his or her mind to its fullest capacity, and one who rejected all faith), while conservatism is intensely aware of man's imperfectability.
3) Ayn Rand was a materialist, while the conservative mindset often focuses on spiritual and moral foundations. She is actually very Marxist in her thinking in this regard.
The unfortunate thing is that it is only a recent phenomena of conservatives praising this pseudo-philosopher. Read up on what William Buckley and Whittaker Chambers, editors of the National Review, had to say about her in the 1950s. Conservatives at first were horrified of her ideas, and rightly so.
How the hell did a godless, militantly anti-community and anti-faith woman become admired by a political ideology that in reality is worlds apart from her?
1) Ayn Rand despised altruism, yet an important tenet of conservatism is the admiration of voluntary charity, community, and association.
2) Ayn Rand believed men were able to achieve perfection (her definition of a perfect person was one who simply used his or her mind to its fullest capacity, and one who rejected all faith), while conservatism is intensely aware of man's imperfectability.
3) Ayn Rand was a materialist, while the conservative mindset often focuses on spiritual and moral foundations. She is actually very Marxist in her thinking in this regard.
The unfortunate thing is that it is only a recent phenomena of conservatives praising this pseudo-philosopher. Read up on what William Buckley and Whittaker Chambers, editors of the National Review, had to say about her in the 1950s. Conservatives at first were horrified of her ideas, and rightly so.
How the hell did a godless, militantly anti-community and anti-faith woman become admired by a political ideology that in reality is worlds apart from her?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 4:52 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Because she gives people affirmation that they are, indeed, individually great.
It's fun to think of yourself as a hero.
It's fun to think of yourself as a hero.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 5:23 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This should be good.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 6:06 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
because the right wing bible thumping sheeple are as stupid as the left wing bible kicking sheeple?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 7:58 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Mainly because she was such a breath of fresh air when juxtaposed with expanding Socialist and Communist philosophies of her time.
I will never understand why Ayn Rand is so admired by my fellow conservatives
quote:No.
Ayn Rand despised altruism
Rand despised those who intimated altruism as requirement or expectation. Her view was "poverty, ignorance, illness and other problems of that kind are not metaphysical emergencies," and self-responsibility was requisite. She had it that "one’s sole obligation toward others, in this respect, is to maintain a social system that leaves men free to achieve, to gain and to keep their values.”
She believed "by the metaphysical nature of man and of existence, man has to maintain his life by his won effort," and in instances where altruism interfered, it was immoral. In simple terms, someone who expects a helping hand must look first to the end of his own arm.
quote:Tying religious philosophy with politics is not Constitutionally conservative.
Ayn Rand believed men were able to achieve perfection (her definition of a perfect person was one who simply used his or her mind to its fullest capacity, and one who rejected all faith), while conservatism is intensely aware of man's imperfectability. Ayn Rand was a materialist, while the conservative mindset often focuses on spiritual and moral foundations.
OTOH, though one could argue many things about Rand, questions of philosophical morality are not one.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 8:18 am to NC_Tigah
Progressives prob. mentioned Rand more than Conservatives today.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 9:32 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I don't personally know one single person that has ever quoted her or used her as an example when it comes to politics or conservative views.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:02 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I attribute her popularity to her effective critique of the Soviet Union and showing the parallels to the New Deal and the sickness of socialism and marxism. From that point when someone is able to diagnose the problem so effectively, most assume her solution is just as valid and are willing to consider her other arguments.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:18 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
She's also an absolutely horrible writer. It makes me question the intelligence of people/politicians when they claim her books to be their favorites.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:38 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
She is actually very Marxist in her thinking in this regard.
Ayn Rand was a free market capitalist. If you are going to call her a Marxist you might as well go ahead and call her a Martian.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:48 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
She's also an absolutely horrible writer.
How so? I'm not an objectivist, and don't agree with her all of her philosophy, but she was not a bad writer. Some books are better then others. I think the Fountainhead can stand on its own, and We the Living is quite powerful. I'm not as big a fan of Atlas Shrugged and Anthem, and maybe because both are more science fiction and I don't think she gave this genre justice.
Her philosophy and non-fiction can be overly terse at times, and I can maybe see your point here, but it does vary.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:49 am to OleWar
quote:
I attribute her popularity to her effective critique of the Soviet Union and showing the parallels to the New Deal and the sickness of socialism and marxism. From that point when someone is able to diagnose the problem so effectively, most assume her solution is just as valid and are willing to consider her other arguments
I agree.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:51 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:If Christian conservatives were bothered by picking and choosing parts of a book that appealed to their worldview and ignoring or handwaving the parts that contradicted it they wouldn't be Christians.
How the hell did a godless, militantly anti-community and anti-faith woman become admired by a political ideology that in reality is worlds apart from her?
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:55 am to Iosh
quote:Interesting qualification.
Christian conservatives
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:55 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
You're attempting to tie religious philosophy to conservative political philosophy and both are stand alone philosophies. The mistake is insisting the religious defines the political and vice versa.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 11:04 am to OleWar
quote:
I think the Fountainhead can stand on its own, and We the Living is quite powerful.
I think The Fountainhead is her best work.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 11:39 am to OleWar
quote:
I attribute her popularity to her effective critique of the Soviet Union and showing the parallels to the New Deal and the sickness of socialism and Marxism
She did call it on the mind set of Totalitarianism, and what it had to do to maintain power: Coercion and the necessity of crushing individualism.
She's been proven right on that.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 12:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Wrong.
1) Ayn Rand despised altruism, yet an important tenet of conservatism is the admiration of voluntary charity, community, and association.
quote:Wrong.
3) Ayn Rand was a materialist, while the conservative mindset often focuses on spiritual and moral foundations. She is actually very Marxist in her thinking in this regard.
The problem with Rand was that her writing style was atrocious. Decent points; weak books.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 12:17 pm to Blue Velvet
quote:
The problem with Rand was that her writing style was atrocious. Decent points; weak books.
This. Some of her philosophical points were spot on. She was a self-indulgent hack though, and her books were terrible. The 50 page John Galt speech in Atlas Shrugged epitomized that. AS could have been readable if she cut it in half, but she needed bloviate for over a thousand pages. She was also a pretty shitty person
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 12:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
what you actually know about Ayn Rand could literally fit on the head of a pin.
you do seem to be good at regurgitating the right wing gobbeldy asian of the Robertson-Buchanan crowd of religious idiot zealots that need everyone to agree with them.
grats on your stupidity of what Rands philosophical tenets are, meritocracy is it's own reward and doesn't need approval from idiots like you to substantiate it, no wonder you are so confused and simultaneously afraid of it.
quote:more like focuses on why everyone should agree with your concept of what is "spiritual" or moral.
the conservative mindset often focuses on spiritual and moral foundations.
which is why "conservatives" aren't really for individual freedom, you are part of a group think collective of right wingers with no real concept of individualism, you need a religion to bow down to because, let's face it, that's what you are good at, submitting to state condescension where the state and your religion are much the same.
quote:
Conservatives at first were horrified of her ideas, and rightly so.
yes, conservatives who are used to being led around by their nose are horrified at the thought of having to think for themselves or that someone else might choose to do so rather than go along with your "all for the greater glory of god" bs.
Yep, we know right wing statists like you are every bit as dangerous as the left wing variety, and are in so many ways, very much alike.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News