- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Response to naysayers of ARMY Document leaked
Posted on 8/18/14 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 8/18/14 at 2:24 pm
LINK
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 11:03 am
Posted on 8/18/14 at 2:35 pm to Tiger Tat
Then why aren't they in Ferguson?
Then again, the protestors aren't exactly "unarmed", either.
Then again, the protestors aren't exactly "unarmed", either.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 2:40 pm to Tiger Tat
Thats not a real Army ROE flowchart.
Alex Jones man? Seriously?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:08 pm to Tiger Tat
Look up Title 10, SRUF, Stafford Act, Posse Commitatus in your Google search bar.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:26 pm to kilo
quote:
Thats not a real Army ROE flowchart.
The document linked is legit. Current Army doctrine.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:34 pm to Tiger Tat
I'm not remotely worried...that is the single worst disaster that could happen...for the army and for the government.
you get even a single video of the army putting down people in the streets and they're going to have a much bigger problem than riots on their hand.
you get even a single video of the army putting down people in the streets and they're going to have a much bigger problem than riots on their hand.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:41 pm to Tiger Tat
You know Alex Jones is a ridiculous fear monger, and nothing he says has any bearing on reality, right?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:45 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:How is that different than any other media outlet?
You know Alex Jones is a ridiculous fear monger, and nothing he says has any bearing on reality, right?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:49 pm to Tiger Tat
I would be more surprised if something like this didn't exist. I would bet that there have been many domestic war game scenarios brainstormed.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:52 pm to mauser
Im sure there are people paid to come up with contingency plans for anything and everything , like preparing for the day when Rhode Island takes over the world or something like that
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:52 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Current Army doctrine.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:54 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Current Army doctrine.
How much resistance will the Army have against committing violence against Americans, in your opinion?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:06 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, a U.S. Army manual that describes how political activists in prison camps will be indoctrinated by specially assigned psychological operations officers.
Not an active FM.
quote:
The 132-page document, titled U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances (PDF), was written in April 2014 and recently obtained by Public Intelligence.
Did these dumbasses not see the distribution notice at the bottom of the cover page?
quote:
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Yeah, really dug something up there...
Because modern jackasses don't read too good...
quote:
2-4. For the U.S. Army, conducting civil disturbance missions within the United States. will vary greatly when compared to conducting civil disturbance missions within a foreign country where the U.S. Army is conducting operations. Except as expressly authorized by the Constitution of the United States or by another act of Congress, the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) prohibits the use of the Active Army as
enforcement officials to execute state or federal law and perform direct law enforcement functions within Chapter 2 2-2 ATP 3-39.33 21 April 2014
CONUS.
That basically sums up the difference between Title 10 (Regular Army, Reserve Soldiers on AD) vs Title 32/SAD National Guard which do have DLA as long as it's the state that is paying them and not Uncle Sam.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:14 pm to kilo
quote:
Thats not a real Army ROE flowchart.
Laugh all you want but you may want to check it out...for real.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:14 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
How is that different than any other media outlet?
Touche
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:24 pm to kilo
quote:
kilo
Excuse me, but what did I say that it is so amusing to you?
Try looking at apd.army.mil. Hopefully it will be just as entertaining.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:26 pm to Wolfhound45
Is it an active FM. Answer that question.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:29 pm to Clames
quote:
Not an active FM.
Did not say it was. That was not the focus of the article. It was ATP 3-39.33. And since I can find it on adp.army.mil I know it is current Army doctrine.
As far as the read of your post, you are correct. It is open source information.
As far as the information regarding Title 10 of US Code versus Title 32, yeah, I kind of know just a little bit of it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News