- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/28/14 at 10:54 am to LSUTigers1986
quote:
Why are parishes on board with this but not the loop?
we don't know that they are. Yet. I'm sure WBR, IP, and AP would take a bypass, but you only have to deal with three parish's bullshite to get that done. Talk about a loop and you have 4-5 parishes that you have to placate.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 11:59 am to LSUTigers1986
quote:
Why are parishes on board with this but not the loop?
This is the southern loop Ascension and Iberville didn't want.
I think they are on board with the loop...they just wanted the bridge in a different place than some of the other parish presidents on the former BR Loop. I recall the Parish President of Iberville being outspoken that his parish needed the bridge - and not another one connecting WBR to EBR.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 3:29 pm to LSUTigers1986
quote:
Why are parishes on board with this but not the loop?
This is the southern loop Ascension and Iberville didn't want.
Ascension wanted the bridge, but "the loop" was a toll road with an unprecedentedly wide right of way, that was proposed in order in conjunction to new zoning that would simultaneously de-value residential property, allow the property to be imminent domain-ed on the cheap, have the toll road built while controlling where all of the on-ramps, off-ramps, and overpasses go, and then selling the remaining "right of way" back to developers at rock bottom prices, just in time for the land to be re-zoned as dense commercial/mixed use residential property. The developers make a ton, the old families lose their homes and homesteads, and the loop swings so far south that no one uses it.
However, a Southern loop is needed, but many of the proposed routes were simply massive land snatching schemes.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News