Started By
Message

ATT U-Verse v. Cox

Posted on 7/5/14 at 10:49 am
Posted by SonOfAGun
Member since Jul 2014
492 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 10:49 am
I have cox now and paying $74/mo just for internet. Thinking about switching to U-Verse. Any thoughts? Is U-Verse really that much better that Cox, service-wise?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
72624 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:15 am to
My parents have Cox and it's awesome. My apartment has UVerse and it sucks.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:17 am to
I gave up on Cox years ago when the guys they sent out to fix a broken cable looked like they had been hired that morning at the Home Depot parking lot.
Posted by Big Saint
Houston
Member since May 2009
1456 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:27 am to
I have UVerse and really like it. The internet won't be as fast as Cox but I've never had a single outage and it's still fast enough for Netflix.

The TV stuff from UVerse is great especially if you get the movie channels. UVerse pricing really beats Cox in this department.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:31 am to
I pay that same 74$ gladly. It's the best internet you can get and it's not even close.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:11 pm to
When I switched from U-Verse to Cox, the 50mbps package was $67. It shortly went up to $74, so I threatened to cancel. Now I pay $59 for the $74 package. If you have u-verse available, you have the power to negotiate.

I personally wouldn't switch to u-verse. What's their 24mbps price? Like $60+ a month? So you'd save a few dollars for half the speed and double the latency (assuming you couldn't get your bill lowered, which you can). Not sure what their 45mbps price is, because it's not available where I am. Too far from the VRAD.

I wrote a long post recently about the pros and cons of cox and u-verse: LINK
Posted by Crimson G
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2013
1353 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 8:52 pm to
I have Uverse and haven't experienced any problems. I'm paying for 24 down and average around 20 over Wifi. I don't watch much tv but went ahead and got the U300 for the SEC Network. Where I live is a finalist for Google fiber (and I heard the we unofficially got it), so I'm expecting a significant upgrade in service in the near future.
Posted by Guess
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
3802 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 9:14 pm to
Product wise, cox is better, but not enough better than uverse for the difference in price.
Posted by Sprocket46
Member since Apr 2014
732 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 10:52 pm to
Att TV interface is awesome, but their crap internet makes it not worth it. They will also randomly increase your bill until you get pissed and call them. I had enough and went back to cox. ATT wouldn't even stream Netflix in HD.
Posted by TexasTiger39
Member since Mar 2009
3671 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:54 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/8/20 at 11:05 am
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6400 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:42 am to
I've had both... Cox's cust service is way worse than ATTs. 3 months in a row they tried to charge me late fees and or cancel my service when I had the auto bill pay set up since the beginning of my contract which was started damn near 9mths prior. They then tried to pull one over on my wife and i proceeded to almost tell the guy to get fricked when I got on the phone. Cancelled right then and there.
I have no problems with my ATT internet, its fast enough for what I want it for and I pay less with way better TV. I have never had any outages or problems with either the net or tv. That all being said.... Cox was okay, but the cust service got me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram