Started By
Message

re: Report: Miami in discussions to play against Alabama or LSU

Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40003 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

I have a good grasp of their expenses. Thanks.

So you wouldn't rather bring in a guaranteed ~4 Million with no expenses over ~4 million (sometimes) with lots of expenses?

Listen, I understand your angle on the economic impact that LSU football has on Baton Rouge. I love Baton Rouge and Louisiana and want to see both thrive. The simple fact is, no matter how you slice it, the LSU AD wants to make money and they really don't owe Baton Rouge anything. LSU isn't a charity (though they still pump millions in the academic end and Baton Rouge every year). Making money = better facilities and coaches and, in turn, better recruits and a better team.
Posted by BamaHater
Houston
Member since Sep 2003
13539 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

So why would the Athletic Department schedule neutral site games if they COULD schedule home and home games and make more money?
It's not as easy as picking up the phone and calling a team like Miami or Penn State and setting up a home and home series. Like LSU most teams on the top caliber want these one off neutral site games as well.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43765 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:36 pm to
Great article here.

Keep in mind this is only people that live outside of Baton Rouge and doesn't include those that do..... (local economic impact is huge):

quote:

A recent study, commissioned by the Tiger Athletic Foundation, found that LSU athletics had an economic impact of $397.5 million on the four-parish Baton Rouge area in 2012. The metro area is composed of East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Livingston and Ascension parishes.

quote:

LSU athletics largest economic impact was in the arts, entertainment, and recreation categories, coming in at nearly $160 million. Food services and drinking establishments had nearly a $32 million impact on Baton Rouge metro, while real estate and rental and leasing firms, had about a $30 million impact.

quote:

“Over a 7-game home season, total spending by fans from outside the metro is $62.8 million in Louisiana, with $47.7 million of that spent within Baton Rouge metro,” the study said.
Posted by TheRookbird
Member since Aug 2013
1322 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

The simple fact is, no matter how you slice it, the LSU AD wants to make money and they really don't owe Baton Rouge anything. LSU isn't a charity (though they still pump millions in the academic end and Baton Rouge every year). Making money = better facilities and coaches and, in turn, better recruits and a better team.


LSU is a state university. Taxpayer dollars go to keep it open (albeit less in recent years.. thanks to the horrible arse government we have). LSU athletics ONLY exists because LSU exists. Therefore they owe the university, the city and the state a little bit of thought when scheduling these games that have such a large economic impact on both the city and state. Especially if you're going to be moving that impact to another state.

With the new TV deal, we're going to be pulling in far more money than we've ever pulled in before. Couple that with a massive increase in premium seating and the AD will be rolling in money for years to come. The difference in taking a gamble the impact of rain on a home game and a smaller guaranteed payout on a neutral site game isn't worth the negative impact on the local economy.

It's absolutely something that should be considered when making those choices and it shouldn't be viewed as a "gift" or "not owing them anything" because it's CLEARLY not the case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram