- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/9/14 at 12:13 pm to twoliter
quote:
I've never understood how this is considered cheating. Especially "cheating" enough to get in trouble for it. The way I see it, the casino is at fault for their own losses for using defective cards. Think about it, if you noticed all the face cards had a different pattern or color or shade on them compared to non-face cards, would you not use that to your advantage? I don't see how it's any different than knowing when another player is bluffing by noticing changes in their behavior.
Casinos have figured out players bet (and lose) more when they drink, so they shower victims, err, players with alcohol. They would do better to simply sweep these events under the rug and trespass players like Ivey in the future. They won't win in court, as Uston proved in Atlantic City.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News