- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: what kind of test
Posted on 2/19/14 at 7:55 pm to fightin tigers
Posted on 2/19/14 at 7:55 pm to fightin tigers
To be fair, if someone took a toke or ate a brownie for a concert it doesn't mean they are a druggie and still shows up the same on a test.
And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
4
Posted on 2/19/14 at 8:00 pm to fr33manator
quote:
To be fair, if someone took a toke or ate a brownie for a concert it doesn't mean they are a druggie and still shows up the same on a test. And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
Is it fair to say both habitual puffers and drunks shouldn't be in the energy transmission and generation bitness?
Posted on 2/19/14 at 8:06 pm to fr33manator
quote:
To be fair, if someone took a toke or ate a brownie for a concert it doesn't mean they are a druggie and still shows up the same on a test.
How hard is it to not do this while looking for employment? May not be a druggie, but definitely have some issues with judgment and I got no problem with a company considering that when hiring them.
quote:
And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
True. Which is why there are rules against alcohol intoxication while at work as well.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 8:15 pm to fr33manator
quote:
To be fair, if someone took a toke or ate a brownie for a concert it doesn't mean they are a druggie and still shows up the same on a test. And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
Drunks usually get their due anyway. If they can't handle their situation they are fired.
Thant being said, alcohol, despite its horror, is still not illegal. Pot is. The company can use the test as nothing more than proof that you can commit to getting a job for long enough to let your hair grow out.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 9:31 pm to fr33manator
quote:
To be fair, if someone took a toke or ate a brownie for a concert it doesn't mean they are a druggie and still shows up the same on a test.
And I'd say habitual drunks are as much if not more dangerous than someone who occasionally enjoys a little puff.
Well the only difference here is one is still currently illegal while the latter is not...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News