Started By
Message

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected

Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Sure it's an extreme long shot. But he basically guaranteed that we had a 0 percent chance of winning if they made the field goal. It really can't be defended.
dont bring this reasoning to miles fans. they are too stupid to understand the issue isn't rather or not we would have won its the fact that our coach killed the very small percent chance we had.
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

the issue isn't rather or not we would have won its the fact that our coach killed the very small percent chance we had.


This is basically a correct statement.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
42881 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 4:45 pm to
Logic has nothing to do with your Miles hate

We lost because of to's and inept D on 3rd downs

But that doesn't help your shitty agenda
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram