- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NCAA Playoff Committee Selected
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:51 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:51 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:52 am to GeauxAggie972
This will be awful and biased
The BCS wasn't broken. The "BCS Busters" have an even lesser chance at making it to the title game now. What a crock.
The BCS wasn't broken. The "BCS Busters" have an even lesser chance at making it to the title game now. What a crock.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:53 am to GeauxAggie972
Big 12 has no representation?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:53 am to VermilionTiger
Mother f'in Tyrone Willingham. Forgot all about him
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:53 am to VermilionTiger
No reporter should be a part of this...
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:54 am to VermilionTiger
As long as it stays at 4, I'll be somewhat ok with it.
Although, most years I would say a four team playoff isn't needed.
It won't stop at four though.
It might almost be worth it if we can get rid of the Chik Fil A bowl,
Although, most years I would say a four team playoff isn't needed.
It won't stop at four though.
It might almost be worth it if we can get rid of the Chik Fil A bowl,
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:55 am to GeauxAggie972
quote:
Former Stanford/Notre Dame/Washington coach Tyrone Willingham
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:57 am to GeauxAggie972
so ridiculous to have current ADs
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:57 am to alajones
2008...choose 4
01) 12-1 Florida
02) 12-1 Oklahoma
03) 12-1 Texas
04) 12-1 Texas Tech
05) 12-1 Alabama
06) 11-1 USC
07) 11-1 Penn St
08) 12-0 Utah
09) 12-0 Boise St
10) 12-1 Ball St
01) 12-1 Florida
02) 12-1 Oklahoma
03) 12-1 Texas
04) 12-1 Texas Tech
05) 12-1 Alabama
06) 11-1 USC
07) 11-1 Penn St
08) 12-0 Utah
09) 12-0 Boise St
10) 12-1 Ball St
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:00 am to GeauxAggie972
can someone explain to me how its a good idea to have CURRENT athletic directors on this committee?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:00 am to VermilionTiger
Ball St. Utah Boise St. Alabama.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:02 am to St Augustine
quote:
can someone explain to me how its a good idea to have CURRENT athletic directors on this committee?
No
Can someone explain to me how it's a good idea to have Condoleeza Rice, a known Alabama fan, with nothing to do with College Football..on this committee?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:06 am to VermilionTiger
i thought she is a stanford fan?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:07 am to GeauxAggie972
I hate the fact that the NCAA went with a selection committe. I don't see why they couldn't use the current BCS computer formula, or something similar, and just take the top 4 from that. A selection committe is begging for controversy.
I played I-AA ball and our 16 team playoff was selected by a committe of AD's every year. The top 10 were always a given, but the final 3 or 4 wild card spots were always a toss up and it came down to which AD could make a deal for his conference. I can only imagine it being that much more complicated with all the money that is on the line for a National Championship playoff.
I played I-AA ball and our 16 team playoff was selected by a committe of AD's every year. The top 10 were always a given, but the final 3 or 4 wild card spots were always a toss up and it came down to which AD could make a deal for his conference. I can only imagine it being that much more complicated with all the money that is on the line for a National Championship playoff.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:07 am to VermilionTiger
honestly Rice is a good add IMO. She has plenty of experience on the highest level of meeting/communicating with leaders with huge egos and coming to a rationale conclusion. So from an facilitator type role, I think she will be valuable. I think she was highly considered to be the NFL commish a while back.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 9:08 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:08 am to VermilionTiger
quote:
2008...choose 4
01) 12-1 Florida
02) 12-1 Oklahoma
03) 12-1 Texas
04) 12-1 Texas Tech
05) 12-1 Alabama
06) 11-1 USC
07) 11-1 Penn St
08) 12-0 Utah
09) 12-0 Boise St
10) 12-1 Ball St
Okay how about choose 4
Oh wait, why would you when there are clearly two teams above the rest.
2005
1 USC 12-0
2 Texas 12-0
3 Penn State 10-1
4 Ohio State 9-2
5 Oregon 10-1
6 Notre Dame 9-2
7 Georgia 10-2
8 Miami (Fla.) 9-2
9 Auburn 9-2
10 Virginia Tech 10-2
2002
1 Miami 12-0
2 Ohio State 13-0
3 Georgia 12-1
4 USC 10-2
5 Iowa 11-1
6 Washington St. 10-2
7 Oklahoma 11-2
8 Kansas State 10-2
9 Notre Dame 10-2
10 Texas 10-2
Anyway, maybe "most years" was probably incorrect. I've never seen a need for 8 teams though.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 9:11 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:16 am to alajones
The problem is every year is different, and anybody can cherry-pick a year to back up their argument. But I agree, 4 is enough. Teams at the bottom half of the top-10 don't deserve a chance at a national championship.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:17 am to Myshkin
quote:West Virginia's AD is in there.
Big 12 has no representation?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News