Started By
Message

re: Ford Owners Sue for Defective Ecoboost Engine

Posted on 5/24/13 at 1:25 pm to
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
57725 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 1:25 pm to
I'd go with a supercharger first, not turbos.

Turbos run at such a high temp bad things happen.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66968 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 1:27 pm to
Turbos are much more reliable than superchargers. So simple.
Posted by brbowhunter
baton rouge
Member since Apr 2013
851 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

I'd go with a supercharger first, not turbos.

Turbos run at such a high temp bad things happen.


soo much wrong with this post its ridiculous.

lets see most diesel engines run turbos and these are big engines

like ships, heavy equipment, hell anything that needs alot of torque.

superchargers are pointless. they limit the power right off the bat. they take 30% of the power they make to just run the charger.

turbos can make as much power as the motor can handle.

hell i just sold my 240 sx 4cyclinder that had 500 hp and still got 24 miles to the gallon, when not in boost.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram