Started By
Message

re: Nnamdi unlikely

Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:33 am to
Posted by death valley driver
CHOPPA CITY
Member since Jul 2004
11614 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:33 am to
quote:

But seriously, no way he gets that kind of money, especially if it is just between us and SF


over the total length of the deal its possible if they offer him 3-4 years brother
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10060 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:34 am to
Not sure why all the reports are saying our deal is better than SF's. What are they offering him? The vet min for 3-4 years?
Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:35 am to
SF will still probably be in worse shape than us in 3-4 years considering Kaepernik is still on his rookie deal.

I'm guessing you're still IN, since you didn't announce yourself OUT.
Posted by Bduhon55
St. Petersburg, FL
Member since Sep 2008
3407 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:40 am to
This makes no sense to the situation....

1) If it were that big of a difference and everyone was so sure SF was the title contender, his decision would have been made a long time ago.

2) All of the reports have been that he is completely torn between both teams...if he is torn then the contracts have to be almost identical and I doubt they are either one year deals or more than 3 years. Both teams are strapped or cash so it's going to be a multiple year deal with the first year being cap friendly.

3) All report have said the Saints are pushing hard to get him...there is no way if they were 7-9 mil off they would be "pushing hard". That's Kruger money and his price tag was too high for the Saints.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram