Started By
Message

re: Would The Walking Dead have been better on HBO?

Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:49 am to
Posted by Gnar Cat21
Piña Coladaburg
Member since Sep 2009
16892 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:49 am to
Exactly. Everyone saying it would just be about nudity and cussing isn't looking at the whole story

Funding would be higher, which would have meant better actors (sorry some of these actors are really terrible) and overall would have just been better funded. Meaning better props, crew, would have had more time to film, and it would overall just be a cleaner, tighter show.

I love walking dead, I really do, but money almost always helps a show. You can just afford to do more.
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7241 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Exactly. Everyone saying it would just be about nudity and cussing isn't looking at the whole story

Funding would be higher, which would have meant better actors (sorry some of these actors are really terrible) and overall would have just been better funded. Meaning better props, crew, would have had more time to film, and it would overall just be a cleaner, tighter show.

I love walking dead, I really do, but money almost always helps a show. You can just afford to do more.


Totally agree. And more eloquently stated. Budget superiority (for sets, actors, writers, etc.) is the primary reason it would be so much better on HBO.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52627 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:53 am to
No Commercials.

this season it seems like the ads are overpowering the show
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15767 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

sorry some of these actors are really terrible


how dare you
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram