- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To all Oregon lovers - 2 wins against winning record teams?
Posted on 11/9/10 at 2:03 pm to therocketscientist
Posted on 11/9/10 at 2:03 pm to therocketscientist
quote:
To all Oregon lovers - 2 wins against winning record teams?
Now, don't get me wrong, I think Oregon has a fabulously exciting offense, Their productivity in yardage and scoring sure are impressive.
However, I would like to call to mind 2 facts
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
12
Posted on 11/9/10 at 2:12 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
Oregen's offense (overall) might be a little better than Aub's. Aub's defense is definitely better than UO's and the special teams is debatable. So, how exactly would UO run all over LSU?
Posted on 11/9/10 at 2:32 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them
says the worst poster on the board.....just like oklahoma was going to run all over lsu in 2003.....ohio state going to run all over florida in 2006.....oklahoma going to run all over florida in 2008.....yeah, yeah....team plays no good defensive teams and they are suddenly awesome.....the good news is, we will have to wait several months...and by then you will have over 100,000 posts...but i will save this one to show you what almost everyone else on this board knows...you are a complete idiot, and probably an imposter lsu fan.
This post was edited on 11/9/10 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 11/9/10 at 2:56 pm to dukke v
quote:
I think Stanford and LSU are about =
Nominated for the dumbest statement of the year in a single post.
Posted on 11/9/10 at 3:43 pm to dukke v
quote:
I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
Is this a joke?
Posted on 11/9/10 at 3:44 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
Did you really just equate Stanford's defense to LSU's defense?
Holy shite
This post was edited on 11/9/10 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:00 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
Your argument pisses me off! You have the opinion that UO would run all over LSU, and it seems to be based on the fact that Cam Newton seemed unstoppable against the Tigers. Your opinion that Stanford is equal to LSU is flamitory, as well. Did you notice that LSU never blitzed Newton? Do you know why not? My belief is that LSU defense did not blitz against Newton because his passing numbers were so good against the blitz before that game. Personally, I feel like LSU should have called a few blitzes in the second half, but that's just my opinion. I would have liked to see Newton suffer a few of the hits that our QBs suffered. Anyway, I digressed....UO has not faced a defense anywhere near as good as LSUs, nor has Stanford. This Tiger offense is developing, and it has plenty of depth. Our defense is deep, as well. No way Stanford has that depth. They were the dregs of the Pac 10 just a couple of years back. The friggin Pac 10 has 4 decent teams, count'em 4. The SEC West has 5 in the top 20!!
Stanford, my arse! LSU would give UO all they wanted, and more. That's my opinion!
Geaux Tigers.
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:14 pm to dukke v
Wow, what a tard.
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:27 pm to dukke v
quote:
I think Stanford and LSU are about =
Granted that Andrew Luck is the best pro style QB in the nation but this comment is freaking retarted, are you kidding me?
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:35 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
PeeJ - I've tried with you. I really, really have. It's obvious we don't even speak the same language.
Goodbye.
Posted on 11/9/10 at 4:54 pm to dukke v
quote:
This is all fine and dandy. But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU. LSU could not keep up the pace. I don't care who they have beaten. Its the WAY in which they have beaten these teams. I think Stanford and LSU are about = and look at what The Ducks did to them.
hey guys, PJ thinks stanford and LSU are about equal, so lets just stop discussing this, the expert has spoken
Posted on 11/9/10 at 7:33 pm to dukke v
quote:
But to be Honest UO would run all over LSU.
Oregon would not score 30 points on LSU IMO...
Posted on 11/9/10 at 8:53 pm to dukke v
quote:
I think Stanford and LSU are about
Yeah that's why Stanford's D is ranked 37th against Pac-10 opponents and LSU's D is ranked in the Top 10 against an overwhelmingly harder schedule. The only thing that Stanford has over LSU is the QB, but if he's on his back all day with Nevis tea-bagging him, it really doesn't matter.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News