Started By
Message

re: LSU Defense

Posted on 10/13/09 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27803 posts
Posted on 10/13/09 at 12:59 pm to
Chavis has a read and react. I am willing to give it a year, but if it doesn't get better next year, back to square one. We need an attacking style defense, not Lou Tepper 101.
Posted by BayouBndt
Shreveport
Member since Dec 2007
3168 posts
Posted on 10/13/09 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Lou Tepper


This is who I think about when I watch this Defense.
Posted by Tomm
Member since Aug 2009
1298 posts
Posted on 10/13/09 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

We need an attacking style defense


Thanks but no thanks on your definition of attacking. My definition is causing turnovers which right now I believe is up to 11 or 12. LSU is +7 in turnover margin, near the top of the entire nation. Attacking just for the sake of throwing a bunch of players at the LOS is useless. What counts is how many points are scored and how many extra possessions you give the offense via turnovers.

Chavis grade -- A+
Posted by JudgeBoyett
Mayor of LSWhoville
Member since Feb 2007
1801 posts
Posted on 10/13/09 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Chavis has a read and react. I am willing to give it a year, but if it doesn't get better next year, back to square one. We need an attacking style defense, not Lou Tepper 101


I must be watching a different team. You do realize that LSU held Florida to 13 points, right? I'll guarandamnteeya that that doesn't happen again to Florida the rest of the year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram