Started By
Message

Shuck and Vele shine again

Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:36 pm
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:36 pm
Hahahahahaha

At all the loser tank vaginas that want to build a losing culture… just so we can draft higher?

Loser mentality. We’ve seen the Browns, Jags, and Jets tank and build a losing culture in the process to have a high draft pick. It resonates as losers.

It’s does not work!! Look at the Pats.

We have the pieces to build on. Wipe your vaginas.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73998 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:57 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465765 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

It’s does not work!! Look at the Pats.


The Pats who had to get #3 to restart their franchise?

We probably won't even be that bad this year

So yeah, YOU look at the Pats my boy
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:00 pm to
Good argument.

So glad you responded. Today made you look like a total fool. Hahahaha
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:00 pm to
No response from the doomers?

Vele is Shucks #1 target the last 2 weeks.

We beat Baker at his best known moments.

Defense had 3 maybe 4 stops on fourth down?

CKM finally called a good game on short yardage ( minus 1 or so head scratchers)

Neal looks the part.

Tipton. Vele. JuJuan. Olave. - all we needs is a true #1 and that is a stacked core.

Carl granderson. Sanker. Koolaid. Jordan. Shepherd. Rumph. - good pieces.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:01 pm to
Also. Save your breath SFP. No time for your doom and gloom. We all know you’d rather be right than the Saints prove your sorry arse wrong.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465765 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Today made you look like a total fool.

Naw

The Vele trade was still horrible

Shough looks to have promise but being a competent rookie at 26 was expected
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8711 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:08 pm to
The Vele trade was a bad process. Picking a 25 year old rookie qb is a questionable process.

Neither one is actually bad if they workout. If Shough is a legit nfl starter for 7 years and Vele is a legit starting WR for 3-4 years then those are phenomenal moves.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465765 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Neither one is actually bad if they workout


I'm not going to get into details on this for the 100th time, but that's not how you judge decision-making. You have to do it at the time of the decision.

Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

The Vele trade was still horrible


No it wasn’t At all.
Especially considering our season and how he’s coming along as Shucks guy.

You couldn’t be more wrong. Literally. You’re so wrong that you will never admit it. Own your shitty takes. Eat your crow. You douche bag. Such a douche bag.

I’m married to a lawyer. I know how hard it is to admit you’re wrong and how hard it is to not not make strawman arguments.

I want to punch your fat soft face, Stephen.

Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8711 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:15 pm to
That’s literally what I said. Bad process. Bad “decision.”

But that’s different from a “bad” trade or a bad pick. If they both end up being legit starters then in no world can you say they were bad trades. You would never go back and redo them.

Now if your argument is we should still be concerned about Mickey because it was more luck than embracing better decision making…sure.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465765 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Especially considering our season and how he’s coming along as Shucks guy.


He's 28 in 5 days my dude. We cannot offer this guy a 2nd contract and we're rebuilding. There is literally no long-term upside.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465765 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

That’s literally what I said. Bad process. Bad “decision.”

But that’s different from a “bad” trade or a bad pick. If they both end up being legit starters then in no world can you say they were bad trades

If they're bad decisions they're bad trades/picks.

If they work out, you just got lucky. That doesn't change the nature of the decision being judged.

Sometimes the right decision doesn't work out, on the flip side.

Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41481 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:24 pm to
When your poster boy, Shoughleberry, can compete in the first half of some game we might possibly be able to put a full game together. We must get a better QB next year one way or another.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119758 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

was expected


That’s total bullshite. Half of this board melted in April.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
22869 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

He's 28 in 5 days my dude


Who cares??? You don’t win the argument bc of this.

You ARE NOT A SAINTS FAN. You just live in BR.

You are a fat (saw you out 2 weeks ago) soft argumentative loser. You have no wife or GF and just post pessimistic shite on TD all day to hope you’re right about something.

Accept your loses. You are wrong 98% of the time but you still play the same card.

You’re unhappy. We get it. But stop dragging everyone else down with you. We are not in front of a judge. It’s ok man. Let shite go. You’re wrong!
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73998 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

He's 28 in 5 days my dude. We cannot offer this guy a 2nd contract and we're rebuilding


Do your research better Slo. Yea if he was leaving anytime soon you would have a point. But he is not. You don't. Unless you want to extend a rebuild in a extended time frame to make it easier for you to be right noi? His contract is for 25, 26, 27. And cheap.

" our rebuild is into 2028."
Slo

This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted by RBTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
8963 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:52 pm to
Who's turning 28 in 5 days?

Shuck just turned 26 back in September! He's older than 8 other Starting QBs ...so what

Worry about rebuilding Stanford! Get them & Cal back into the Pac 12 w Oregon State ; Wazzu & Boise St

#MY BAD Vele

Hey i like Stanford really hope they can get to a Playoff one year. Andrew Luck can help
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 8:46 pm
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
18888 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Shough looks to have promise but being a competent rookie at 26 was expected


That’s not true at all.
Posted by SaintTigerPel
LaPlace
Member since Dec 2017
1390 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Liar! Who's turning 28 in 5 days?


He was talking about Vele here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram