- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ABC News has new details on narcoboat strike.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:19 am
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:19 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
ABC’s Martha Raddatz on Wednesday’s ‘World News Tonight’ about drug boat-gate: “And tonight, new information: According to a source familiar with the incident, the two survivors climbed back on to the boat after the initial strike. They were believed to be potentially in communication with others, and salvaging some of the drugs. Because of that, it was determined they were still in the fight and valid targets. A JAG officer was also giving legal advice. So, again, David, that video will be key and Admiral Bradley will be on the Hill tomorrow behind closed doors.”
17
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:19 am to loogaroo
No one cares.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:23 am to loogaroo
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:25 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Yep.
This was over 3 months ago. The pertinent committees had already been briefed in it.
It is no coincidence that this "controversy" arose after the Seditious 6's video.
This was over 3 months ago. The pertinent committees had already been briefed in it.
It is no coincidence that this "controversy" arose after the Seditious 6's video.
This post was edited on 12/4/25 at 6:25 am
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:25 am to loogaroo
quote:
ABC News
Disney/ABC News
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:36 am to udtiger
quote:
Yep.
This was over 3 months ago. The pertinent committees had already been briefed in it.
It is no coincidence that this "controversy" arose after the Seditious 6's video.
They had to release this new info before Bradley goes behind closed doors today
They keep doing these ops because they work on the remedial & the TDS infected like clockwork as witnessed by the countless nuclear meltdowns on this forum
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:41 am to Bobby OG Johnson
They all ran with WAPO’s narrative and now they have egg on their faces. They don’t care though.
Jessie Watters said earlier that this operation was vetted by a fleet of military attorneys.
This smear was all coordinated by the 6 douche bags.
Jessie Watters said earlier that this operation was vetted by a fleet of military attorneys.
This smear was all coordinated by the 6 douche bags.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:43 am to loogaroo
quote:
ABC’s Martha Raddatz
Stopped there
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:44 am to loogaroo
quote:
A JAG officer was also giving legal advice.
I guess they'll demand a committee of politians that are skimming drug money to advise them next!
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:46 am to loogaroo
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:47 am to cajunangelle
Rand Paul is such a little bitch.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:51 am to loogaroo
This just in from Bunky, Rand and Masshole...
This post was edited on 12/4/25 at 6:54 am
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:55 am to loogaroo
I’m sorry but this is ridiculous.
“Trying to get back into the fight”…what fight? Who were the drug runners firing on?
Of course someone blown into the water was trying to get back onto the boat. They were in the fricking water.
“Trying to get back into the fight”…what fight? Who were the drug runners firing on?
Of course someone blown into the water was trying to get back onto the boat. They were in the fricking water.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:55 am to loogaroo
I can't call them geri curlers anymore because Masshole got Ozempic and his hair straightened.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:58 am to loogaroo
quote:
They were believed to be potentially in communication with others, and salvaging some of the drugs.
Seems like a reasonable rationale for murdering some people via executive order and hundreds of thousands of US tax dollars.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:00 am to loogaroo
The mission was to destroy the boat. The boat wasn't destroyed, so another missle was required. Whether or not there were survivors doesn't affect the mission goal.
If there were survivors, they become collateral damage. All within the legal framework.
If there were survivors, they become collateral damage. All within the legal framework.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:00 am to Hateradedrink
Oh my gershness goodness sakes they are innocent fishermens of the sea baws. LEAVE THEM ALONE!
They were clinging to the yogi bear pic a nick baskets that only looked like fentanyl barrels, machine guns and meth bricks-----to save themselves.
They were clinging to the yogi bear pic a nick baskets that only looked like fentanyl barrels, machine guns and meth bricks-----to save themselves.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:02 am to cajunangelle
They would be lucky if it was a war crime. We're not at war. It's just traditional murder.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:02 am to Hateradedrink
quote:
I’m sorry but this is ridiculous.
“Trying to get back into the fight”…what fight? Who were the drug runners firing on?
Of course someone blown into the water was trying to get back onto the boat. They were in the fricking water.
You and others are missing the point and don't understand military action. Survivors do not change the mission goal, to destroy the boat.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News