- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I haven't seen that Raymond is being rehired....
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:48 am
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:48 am
anyone know anything. I hope so, We don't need to lose Pickett or any other DB.
8
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:51 am to QB
Im sure we'll have to wait to sort out DC before knowing anything. But Id imagine theyll try.... unless the new DC has 'his guy' no matter what.
They have to know Pickett and Finney are tied directly to CR
They have to know Pickett and Finney are tied directly to CR
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:54 am to QB
Writers on the pay sites are very optimistic that CR will remain in Baton Rouge on Kiffin's staff.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:56 am to QB
He doesn’t have to be “Rehired”. He’s under contract.
If he wants to keep Baker that includes the staff.
If he wants to keep Baker that includes the staff.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:56 am to QB
I haven't heard, but I can't imagine he would let him go, considering his success at DBU and his recruiting.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:57 am to JiminyCricket
If Baker stays he definitely stays, If not they need to have a long conversation with anyone they are interviewing for the position. Especially if it is a young up and comer.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:58 am to mcspufftiger7
Wonder if Baker would offer him the DC job if he goes to Tulane
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:02 am to TigahJay
I have heard talks from people in the know
CR Frank and baker would be keepers when kiffin is hired
CR Frank and baker would be keepers when kiffin is hired
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:04 am to RB10
quote:
He doesn’t have to be “Rehired”. He’s under contract.
“Rehired” isn’t the correct description of course, but have you read his contract?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:04 am to QB
I'd be shocked if he wasn't at lsu next yr.
No way they make that mistake twice.
No way they make that mistake twice.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:08 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Rehired” isn’t the correct description of course, but have you read his contract?
I don’t need to. He will be here if Baker is, unless he gets a DC position.
That changes if Baker goes to Tulane.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:11 am to QB
quote:
I haven't seen that Raymond is being rehired....
Retained
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:21 am to spslayto
thank you for correcting my misuse of the word. Hopefully, nobody was mislead by my poor choice of words. 
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:26 am to RB10
quote:
I don’t need to. He will be here if Baker is, unless he gets a DC position.
That changes if Baker goes to Tulane.
You’re such a tard. You just spout nonsense. Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:27 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
You’re such a tard. You just spout nonsense.
Ok
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:27 am to QB
I think he stays but the staff is fluid right now since baker may get a HC job. Plus Lane had extra coach on offense so one defensive staffer has to go, maybe only 1 DL coach or DB coach
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:28 am to RB10
I mean that in a nice way.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:31 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I mean that in a nice way.
I don’t really care. Nothing I said was off base no matter how hard you try to “actually” it.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:35 am to QB
quote:
thank you for correcting my misuse of the word. Hopefully, nobody was mislead by my poor choice of words.
You could have just edited the title.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:38 am to RB10
It was odd though. Why bring up the fact that he’s under contract, so he doesn’t have to be “rehired”? His contract terminates in January, although there is a one-year option. I have no doubt that he would be retained, particularly if Baker stays, but some affirmative action on LSU’s part will be needed (i.e., either exercise their option, or more likely, amend the agreement).
That’s not “actually”, that’s the legal process that’s going to have to happen.
That’s not “actually”, that’s the legal process that’s going to have to happen.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News