- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did Lane meet with OM team?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:12 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:12 am
I was curious about this. I was out of the loop late yesterday for several hours.
Wanted to know reaction and if the players wanted him for playoffs.
Wanted to know reaction and if the players wanted him for playoffs.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:12 am to jp4lsu
No, AD wouldn’t allow it. Which imo is to be expected given the circumstances.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:12 am to jp4lsu
No.
I do not think that he was allowed to meet with them.
I do not think that he was allowed to meet with them.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:12 am to jp4lsu
No, Keith Carter did not allow him to
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:13 am to jp4lsu
Said in the interview with Marty that he wasn’t allowed to
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:13 am to jp4lsu
The way it sounds is that Ole Miss moved the meeting back so that they could keep Lane out of the meeting
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:23 am to lsurulz1515
Thanks for the info guys. I heard the Lane release about not being allowed to coach playoff. But not being able to meet with the team with the AD is a crappy move. I understand it wirh the portal influence but if the AD is there i dont see the point.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:23 am to jp4lsu
Apparently he tried to talk to the team leadership players after the meeting but they told him to leave.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:25 am to jp4lsu
It has been said that the players asked the AD to let Lane stay and coach through the playoffs but even they were denied.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:33 am to Tigers4Lyfe
That was supposedly after the Florida game. Reports were the week of the Egg Bowl they were getting tired of it all and wanted him to just go. Just what I've read. But it seemed the team wasn't sad he left.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:36 am to RebelRye
quote:
But it seemed the team wasn't sad he left.
I get that they were probably tired of the distraction, but they all know the main reason they were 11-1 and it wasn't the blow and sorority girls in Oxford.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:39 am to RebelRye
No offense, but OM insiders have wrong every step of the way. Hearing the leaked audio yesterday of the meeting being nearly comply silent I’d say that the bs about them telling him to go was wrong as well.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:44 am to cas4t
quote:
No, AD wouldn’t allow it. Which imo is to be expected given the circumstances.
Why would that be expected? I would expect them to allow the coach to address the team, as is usually the custom. If they don't allow that (and they did not), their "what about the kids" schtick is nonsense.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:45 am to memphisplaya
Guess you've never been in a team meeting before. There's not a ton of talking going on while the AD, Chancellor, or HC is talking. Then the room erupted when he announced Golding.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 10:46 am to RebelRye
Tough day, trying to convince themselves Golding is gonna take that program up near the top
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:07 am to mdomingue
I mean, he took a job at a divisional rival.
I genuinely do not think LSU would have allowed as much either.
I genuinely do not think LSU would have allowed as much either.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 11:34 am to cas4t
quote:
I mean, he took a job at a divisional rival.
I genuinely do not think LSU would have allowed as much either.
I fail to see why a short, controlled meeting with the players would be a problem.
Players will hear all the details we have all heard.
Do you think they will feel resentment toward their coach, who has publicly stated he wanted to finish out coaching the season and wanted to meet with them, or the Ole Miss administration, who prevented either from happening?
Half the Ole Miss team, like much of college football, is mercenaries. What do you think Lane could do while there that he cannot do elsewhere?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:29 pm to mdomingue
Look man, I don’t necessarily disagree with any of your points. I wouldn’t have been shocked if they allowed him to say goodbye.
But it’s also entirely within reason to have told him to pack his shite and go, now. He’s leaving for a rival. They wanted to use the moment to announce Golding, and not make it about Lane. It makes sense, and I think LSU would do the same if Lane were leaving us for Ole Miss.
But it’s also entirely within reason to have told him to pack his shite and go, now. He’s leaving for a rival. They wanted to use the moment to announce Golding, and not make it about Lane. It makes sense, and I think LSU would do the same if Lane were leaving us for Ole Miss.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:28 pm to cas4t
quote:
Look man, I don’t necessarily disagree with any of your points. I wouldn’t have been shocked if they allowed him to say goodbye.
But it’s also entirely within reason to have told him to pack his shite and go, now. He’s leaving for a rival. They wanted to use the moment to announce Golding, and not make it about Lane. It makes sense, and I think LSU would do the same if Lane were leaving us for Ole Miss.
I think it is within reason. I just think it was more about self-preservation by the AD than anything else (I gotta live here). I firmly believe some very influential donors wanted to punish Kiffin. Any AD will have to deal with those and often bend to their pressure; it is the nature of the profession.
So we probably do mostly agree, I just think it was more about pettiness on the Ole Miss side. And it probably would be the same for LSU if it were reversed.
Popular
Back to top

9







