Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Consulting with Mr. Chad Geepeetee...

Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:09 pm
Posted by ActusHumanus
St. George, Louisiana
Member since Sep 2025
453 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:09 pm
I don't know contract law, so I consulted with the expert.

quote:

Termination for Cause – Relevant Clauses
The contract states that LSU may terminate the Head Coach for cause if he:
“(i) fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or the policies, rules, or directives of the University, the LSU System, or the Athletic Director,”
or “
(xii) engages in conduct which, in the reasonable judgment of the University, brings the University or its athletic program into public disrepute, contempt, scandal, or ridicule.”


quote:

How This Applies to the Scenario
Refusing a Directive:
If the athletic director gives a direct order—for example, to dismiss an assistant coach—and Brian Kelly refuses, that refusal would be a clear violation of subsection (i):
“fails to comply with … the directives of the Athletic Director.”

Grounds for Termination:
Because this is explicitly listed under “for cause,” LSU would be legally entitled to terminate Kelly without paying his remaining buyout, provided they document that:
The directive was reasonable and within the AD’s authority, and
Kelly knowingly refused to comply.

Possible Discretion:
LSU could choose not to terminate but could instead treat it as a breach requiring corrective action or issue a formal reprimand. But from a contractual standpoint, the refusal gives them grounds for for-cause termination.
Posted by Jack Crevalle
USVI
Member since Aug 2018
8357 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:11 pm to
Ask Mr. Chad Geepeetee who the next coach will be.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
8794 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:15 pm to
Where is the confirmed reporting, not Tigerdroppings rumors, that Kelly refused to fire Sloan?

The only reports I have read were that Kelly wanted to fire Davis as well and was told no.

I have yet to see a credible media report that Kelly refused to fire someone.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 2:16 pm
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
6665 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

If the athletic director gives a direct order—for example, to dismiss an assistant coach—and Brian Kelly refuses, that refusal would be a clear violation of subsection (i):
“fails to comply with … the directives of the Athletic Director.”


It keeps getting repeated here as if this actually happened, but it didn't. Woodward and 3 others attended the meeting with Kelly to fire him. Woodward wouldn't need 3 witnesses to give a directive. Despite the drama that many want, it was a cordial meeting by all accounts.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
11583 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Grounds for Termination:
Because this is explicitly listed under “for cause,” LSU would be legally entitled to terminate Kelly without paying his remaining buyout, provided they document that:
The directive was reasonable and within the AD’s authority, and
Kelly knowingly refused to comply.

Possible Discretion:
LSU could choose not to terminate but could instead treat it as a breach requiring corrective action or issue a formal reprimand. But from a contractual standpoint, the refusal gives them grounds for for-cause termination.


LMFAO I would actually laugh if LSU presented something like this lmfao.
Posted by Jtigerfan454
Member since Dec 2022
321 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:33 pm to
It says Sumrall
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5739 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 2:34 pm to
Okay, now we need Sloan's contract to see if his firing required Board approval. I'm guessing it did not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram