- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Insider posted what Woodward did that has LSU and Kelly in this lawsuit
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:47 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:47 am
Insider from paid site posted:
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department until they got could get all their ducks in a row for this whole ordeal. Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to terminate, he did so without any proper authority. LSU is now claiming that exact fact and saying that BK is officially being fired for cause not the debacle that Woody caused. BK said put up or shut up, so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause. Will what they have (no I’m not sharing that publicly) be enough to suffice? We’ll see… but more than likely once all the cards are on the table for both sides they’ll head back to the negotiating table to save some face if I had to bet
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department until they got could get all their ducks in a row for this whole ordeal. Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to terminate, he did so without any proper authority. LSU is now claiming that exact fact and saying that BK is officially being fired for cause not the debacle that Woody caused. BK said put up or shut up, so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause. Will what they have (no I’m not sharing that publicly) be enough to suffice? We’ll see… but more than likely once all the cards are on the table for both sides they’ll head back to the negotiating table to save some face if I had to bet
18
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:49 am to Byrdybyrd05
According to Tom Mars, who apparently represents a lot of coaches in these cases, no school has ever won the lawsuit when attempting to fire for cause.
I don't know the veracity of the statement, but add Tom Mars to the chorus of laughter pointed in our direction.
I don't know the veracity of the statement, but add Tom Mars to the chorus of laughter pointed in our direction.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:49 am to Byrdybyrd05
all of this for a settlement that will probably be announced soon.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department
Reassign him to what exactly?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:bullshite.
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department until they got could get all their ducks in a row for this whole ordeal. Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to terminate, he did so without any proper authority. LSU is now claiming that exact fact and saying that BK is officially being fired for cause not the debacle that Woody caused. BK said put up or shut up, so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause. Will what they have (no I’m not sharing that publicly) be enough to suffice? We’ll see… but more than likely once all the cards are on the table for both sides they’ll head back to the negotiating table to save some face if I had to bet
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to Byrdybyrd05
His signed contract was for the HC job at LSU. How do you just "reassign BK inside the athletic department"
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:52 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to terminate, he did so without any proper authority. LSU is now claiming that exact fact and saying that BK is officially being fired for cause not the debacle that Woody caused. BK said put up or shut up, so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause
What does this even mean?
It reads like gibberish.
LSU is fricking stupid. There's no other way to describe it.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:52 am to ProjectP2294
LSU fired Wade for cause. Tenner fired Pruitt for cause. Saying you can't fire for cause and not pay the buyout is factually incorrect.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:53 am to TigerCub
Aramark vendor
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:54 am to TigerCub
quote:
Reassign him to what exactly?
Janitorial duties hopefully.
He has been awol for 2 weeks now.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:55 am to Salviati
the biggest fraud was his coaching
or they will try and spin it that he was golfing, drinking and cheating on his wife when he should have been working
or they will try and spin it that he was golfing, drinking and cheating on his wife when he should have been working
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:55 am to ProjectP2294
Bob Petrino was successfully fired with cause?
Hugh Freeze? Was going to be fired for cause but they settled?
Hugh Freeze? Was going to be fired for cause but they settled?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:56 am to Byrdybyrd05
Why in the world is the Athletic Director not allowed to direct the Athletic Program? If his job is to hire and fire coaches, why doesn’t he have that authority? Why do a bunch of white collar, old men who are placed in their positions by the governor have the authority to make decisions about athletics?
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:57 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:56 am to Byrdybyrd05
Everyone is freaking out when they have only heard one side of the lawsuit. I feel like LSU has something here, we just don't know about it.
Just maybe LSU is the one being "professional" about their business and BK and his team are the scumbags.
Just maybe LSU is the one being "professional" about their business and BK and his team are the scumbags.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:56 am to jcole4lsu
Kelly was fired for performance. Wade and Pruitt were not. They were fired after investigations into conduct.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:56 am to jcole4lsu
quote:
LSU fired Wade for cause. Tenner fired Pruitt for cause. Saying you can't fire for cause and not pay the buyout is factually incorrect.
I thought the Tennessee one was for cause. So Tom Mars is full of shite.
Thank you. (genuinely)
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:56 am to ProjectP2294
Wasn't Mel Tucker fired from Michigan State for cause?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:58 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Insider from paid site posted:
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department until they got could get all their ducks in a row for this whole ordeal. Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to terminate, he did so without any proper authority. LSU is now claiming that exact fact and saying that BK is officially being fired for cause not the debacle that Woody caused. BK said put up or shut up, so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause. Will what they have (no I’m not sharing that publicly) be enough to suffice? We’ll see… but more than likely once all the cards are on the table for both sides they’ll head back to the negotiating table to save some face if I had to bet
Nonsense
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:58 am to YouKnowIt
quote:yes jerking off on the phone with a spokesperson for sexual assault victims is apparently not good
Wasn't Mel Tucker fired from Michigan State for cause?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News