- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump is not happy about SCOTUS and tariffs
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:08 am
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:08 am
24
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Hahaha, right or wrong, thats a damn nice melt.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
If a POTUS can stop trade can he also limit trade? After all, we know this POTUS has several ways to skin the "trade cat" regardless of the SCOTUS ruling.
Thank God he is our POTUS at this time.
Thank God he is our POTUS at this time.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:12 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
He's not wrong
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:13 am to udtiger
quote:
He's not wrong
Article I of the constitution would disagree with you and with Trump.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:14 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Old man yells at sky.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:15 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
our rulers in robes, just like medieval times
Go ahead dumbasses, this frickup will be all on you.
Go ahead dumbasses, this frickup will be all on you.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:15 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
We’ve gotta figure out a way to curb the executive unilaterally declaring a national emergency then that opening up a new set of powers for him.
I wonder if something like allowing the minority party in each chamber to declare the national emergency over with like 75% of the vote would be a good check.
That’s probably against all the rules of the chambers but there has to be a check to this unilateral declaration of emergencies.
I wonder if something like allowing the minority party in each chamber to declare the national emergency over with like 75% of the vote would be a good check.
That’s probably against all the rules of the chambers but there has to be a check to this unilateral declaration of emergencies.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:15 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
His understanding of the law is always entertaining:)
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:16 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
We’ve gotta figure out a way to curb the executive unilaterally declaring a national emergency then that opening up a new set of powers for him.
I wonder if something like allowing the minority party in each chamber to declare the national emergency over with like 75% of the vote would be a good check.
That’s probably against all the rules of the chambers but there has to be a check to this unilateral declaration of emergencies.
It's as if nobody learned anything from the Covid era policies of Trump and Biden, along with numerous states.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:18 am to Timeoday
quote:
If a POTUS can stop trade can he also limit trade? After all, we know this POTUS has several ways to skin the "trade cat" regardless of the SCOTUS ruling.
Thank God he is our POTUS at this time.
He better have every possible "legal" tariff ready to go (and retroactive to "liberation day") the second that SCOTUS ruling comes down to mitigate any potential issues.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:18 am to TBoy
Like you have ever read Articles of the Constitution lol you vote for brain dead morons who flood the nation with immigrants which is the primary responsibility of the president to protect the nation
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
And the border wall Trump’s first term and the inevitable global warming declaration by AOC
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:19 am to Timeoday
quote:
Thank God he is our POTUS at this time.
Amen to that. He just needs better legal advice.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's as if nobody learned anything from the Covid era policies of Trump and Biden, along with numerous states.
It's as if nobody learned anything from the policies of Biden, along with numerous states, that free trade is certainly not free.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:20 am to udtiger
quote:
He better have every possible "legal" tariff ready to go (and retroactive to "liberation day") the second that SCOTUS ruling comes down to mitigate any potential issues.
They're going to have to start over and refund all the tariff monies collected under the illegal acts, if the old tariffs are invalidated.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're going to have to start over and refund all the tariff monies collected under the illegal acts, if the old tariffs are invalidated.
Doubtful
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 9:22 am
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
That will never happen and for the courts to even suggest it is preposterous but the Judiciary is infallible, amirite? The executive gets limited all the time but the Judiciary is free from restraint
Posted on 11/9/25 at 9:23 am to Rip Torn
quote:
and for the courts to even suggest it is preposterous
Why?
Why do you think the government should be able to keep money it seized illegally?
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News