- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tina Peters issues statement from Colorado prison.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:44 am
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:44 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
UPDATE FROM TINA PETERS: 364 Days of Injustice As I approach 365 days in this hellhole—tomorrow marks one full year, and Friday is the anniversary of the day they shackled me and dragged me out of the courtroom—my chest hurts just thinking about it. It's seared into my mind. I've been deprived of everything everyone else takes for granted: going to a restaurant, driving somewhere, flying, being with whoever I want, seeing my granddaughter, visiting my mother who'll be 97 next month. All of that, gone. Where is everybody? I did what I was supposed to do—legally—to expose their crimes. Who has my back now? Where are the people who benefited? Has it been decided that I will be made the SACRIFICIAL LAMB to give the networks something to rally behind? The President has demanded my release four times—twice on Twitter, twice verbally. Why is the DOJ defying Trump's demands? Get off your asses and get me out! This is not right. The state never had jurisdiction to indict, prosecute, or imprison me because of the Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, and Immunities Clause. I was protecting federal election records. Colorado violated federal law by locking me up. The federal government could come in right now, pluck me out, and say, "No, you're violating her constitutional rights. She was performing a federal duty." Send in the marshals—get me! Not just because I'm a whistleblower, but because they had no right to do this. This is straight-up lawfare. I'm a political prisoner suffering cruel and unusual punishment, just like Tore called out in her amicus brief. How many whistleblowers, reports, and proofs do we need? We have already proven it all—yet here I am, in a medium-security prison with murderers, the worst of the worst. People serving life for gruesome murders, featured on Dateline and 20/20. I was just in the gym with one—she's sweet to me, but that's the reality I'm living every day. For what? Protecting elections? The same biased judges who denied my bond with no explanation will drag out any appeal for years. They're not normal; they were put in place illegally, selected by benefactors in these blackmail rings like Epstein and P. Diddy. They collect their dues. Forget the appeal—optics don't matter. Just do it, and deal with the court later. And the prosecutor calls me a danger to society? A flight risk? Meanwhile, they let out a criminal with 39 convictions, 25 felonies, who then murdered that poor little girl. Her father's been yelling about it on Fox News every day—bring that up. It just validates I'm a political prisoner in a state that could be criminally prosecuted for this. Something's got to break. Go to LINK to see the filings and the latest. And if you can support me, I need your help. I cannot pay my attorneys and my appeal still has a very long time to go. If you can help please donate at LINK —Tina Peters
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:46 am to loogaroo
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Tina
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:49 am to loogaroo
Just read her charges.
As a 70 year old, they gave her NINE years for that shite?
Am I missing something?
As a 70 year old, they gave her NINE years for that shite?
Am I missing something?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:50 am to thejuiceisloose
frick off, loser.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:50 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:Take a big step back and literally frick your own face
thejuiceisloose
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:50 am to loogaroo
Democrats hate it when the truth has a light on it. So they imprison you instead.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:51 am to loogaroo
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:52 am to ReauxlTide222
They were sending a message by making her an example....and she is right.
When she is released, and she will be, she will sue and collect...bigly.
When she is released, and she will be, she will sue and collect...bigly.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:56 am to loogaroo
The DOJ needs to go after everyone that imprisoned her.
Just start arresting all their asses, now. You drop their charges and they commute her sentence.
Just start arresting all their asses, now. You drop their charges and they commute her sentence.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:57 am to loogaroo
Is it accurate she has State charges-if she had fed charges she would be commuted by now?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:58 am to Houag80
Not familiar with this one or I forgot. Quick synopsis, please.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:04 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Is it accurate she has State charges-if she had fed charges she would be commuted by now?
That's what some are saying . Not sure of the whole picture though.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:04 am to thejuiceisloose
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Comey
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's where you're wrong
Depends on who is in power.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:10 am to Houag80
Why doesn't trump get her out himself, he commuted some drug dealer that was in jail for 40 plus years but not someone who was trying to show corruption. Why doesn't he get those jan. 6 people out, they have been in jail for over three years.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:12 am to Diamondawg
quote:
Not familiar with this one or I forgot. Quick synopsis, please.
She was an election official in Colorado who fraudulently used the identity of an IT person to access data she didn't have the authority to access and transferred that data to an unauthorized third party. That third party then published the data, which included personal data of voters in Mesa County, IIRC, and all sorts of sensitive data for the elections office.
Oh and this crime was all pre-meditated as she had the cameras covering the machines turned off prior to the illegal access.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:12 am to thejuiceisloose
Hope you feel the same way about Obama
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:13 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Is it accurate she has State charges-if she had fed charges she would be commuted by now?
Yes, but the DOJ could have one of the US Attorneys for CO, or Harmeet Dillon as the USA in charge of the civil rights division go after Griswold, the Governor and the entire state of Colorado for civil rights violations, particularly deprivation of rights under color of law.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:14 am to loogaroo
quote:
Depends on who is in power.
Nah. This one is pure q Anon Insanity. Nothing about what she did is legal or proper. Even if she wants to be considered a whistleblower, you have to give that information to government officials. You can't just give it to some rando to publish on the internet, and you certainly can't fraudulently use the identity of a person who has security access to get the data to remove it. Nothing about that is legal or proper
Popular
Back to top


19











