- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mini 14 Ranch hardwood NATO 556
Posted on 9/19/25 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 9/19/25 at 7:52 pm
Anyone have one of these with any recs on ammo? And magazines?
This post was edited on 9/19/25 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 9/19/25 at 7:59 pm to W2NOMO
any ammo is fine
only use ruger magazines
only use ruger magazines
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:19 pm to W2NOMO
Gov’t ammo is best, if you can source it…
I stick w/manufacturers magazines…
I stick w/manufacturers magazines…
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:28 pm to RichJ
Any pref on 10 or 20 round mags?
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:35 pm to W2NOMO
They are cool guns, but notoriously inaccurate. Don’t spend tons of time or money trying different loads trying to make it shoot sub moa.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:44 pm to captdalton
quote:
but notoriously inaccurate.
Not anymore.
I’m also convinced a lot of people suck with open sights.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:46 pm to captdalton
the newer ones with the thicker barrel are much more accurate than the pencil barrel ones. I have a mini 30 it ain’t winning any sniper awards but it hits minute of pie plate no problem. Accu-strut helps a great deal as well
the pros are you get a wood and steel rifle that is comfortable to shoot, cycles 100% and hardly ever needs cleaning
the pros are you get a wood and steel rifle that is comfortable to shoot, cycles 100% and hardly ever needs cleaning
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:49 pm to W2NOMO
quote:
Any pref on 10 or 20 round mags?
For what I use mine for, I prefer the 10 and 5 round mags. But I have 20 rd as well. I just prefer it to be light and compact.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:39 pm to Theduckhunter
year 2007 or there about the R ranch rifle was completely reworked. Before that you had to stand inside a barn to hit it. the 2015 I have makes a great rifle with Leopold scope and all
Posted on 9/19/25 at 11:18 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Before that you had to stand inside a barn to hit it.
Not all of them. The problem was massive inconsistencies.
I have one that can shoot the diamonds out of a playing card at 200 yards.
I have a second one that if you aim at the center silhouette... You may punch the one to the left...or the right. There's no rhyme or reason to it.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:16 pm to W2NOMO
quote:
Any pref on 10 or 20 round mags?
Absolutely! 20, if I could get reliable feeding 30 round magazines, I’d probably do those also…
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:28 pm to RichJ
Ordered Ruger 20 and 10. One each. Still $85. ??
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:51 pm to W2NOMO
yes they are expensive LOL
aftermarket mags don’t work though I’ve tried
aftermarket mags don’t work though I’ve tried
Posted on 9/20/25 at 3:17 pm to W2NOMO
20rnd from Ruger, $42.95. I bought mine 20+yrs ago @ G&H in Gueydan, I don’t remember paying anywhere near that… 
Posted on 9/20/25 at 4:48 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
you had to stand inside a barn to hit it
Ruger frequently changed rifling twists in them. This and the pencil thin barrels did not make them necessarily inaccurate rifles. They just had to be fed ammo that liked the twist ratio, but at the same time were able to reproduce the same harmonics shot after shot, which can be more challenging with a long thin barrel. Using the same ammo before and after, I've seen quite a few decrease group sizes significantly, just by adding a muzzle device. The reason is that the muzzle brake or flash hider adds weight to the end of the barrel and changes the harmonics. Simply put, certain rifles like certain ammo, and the thinner the barrel, the more picky they can be to an extent, but it can be overcome.
quote:
I’m also convinced a lot of people suck with open sights.
This is the most likely answer for the bad reputation though.
This post was edited on 9/20/25 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 9/22/25 at 6:17 am to captdalton
quote:
They are cool guns, but notoriously inaccurate. Don’t spend tons of time or money trying different loads trying to make it shoot sub moa
This comment is more accurate than the weapon.....lol.
I have one, have owned several versions of it. They are what I call a clanky gun. Great for defense and fun......but not a sniper.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:30 am to TideHater
quote:
trying to make it shoot sub moa
quote:
not a sniper
Well no shite. I'm not sure why the experts find it necessary to judge a rifle on the ability to shoot sub moa and sniping. The mini-14 does what it was made to do really well. That is being compact, handy, reliable, durable, simple to operate and accurate enough to meet the same milspec standards (15" groups at 300 yards) as the M16 service rifle, which is NOT a sub moa or "sniper" rifle by any means.
This post was edited on 9/22/25 at 9:36 am
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:46 am to Buck_Rogers
The problem with the mini 14 is that it's just plain outdated. An AR15 can be had for half the price, uses $12 magazines and 9/10 of them will be more accurate than the most accurate mini 14's are. The AR is just a more useful and more modern design.
Mini's are cool just like M1A's are cool, but both are easily out-shot by far cheaper rifles. Both are rooted in the first ever successful semi auto rifle designed for the US military. It's just a damned old design. It's expensive to make and not easy to make into an accurate rifle.
The one exception where the mini 14 outshines the other options is places where pistol grip rifles are a problem. It's really the only option for a normal-stock semi automatic .223
Mini's are cool just like M1A's are cool, but both are easily out-shot by far cheaper rifles. Both are rooted in the first ever successful semi auto rifle designed for the US military. It's just a damned old design. It's expensive to make and not easy to make into an accurate rifle.
The one exception where the mini 14 outshines the other options is places where pistol grip rifles are a problem. It's really the only option for a normal-stock semi automatic .223
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:10 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:which is why there will always be a market for the mini. Some of us don’t like the AR platform for various reasons and prefer wood and steel over plastic and aluminum. Pretty straightforward
It's really the only option for a normal-stock semi automatic .223
Popular
Back to top

5




