- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Us asylum immigration policy
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:06 pm
Since it seems like most of the ire around "illegal" immigrants is asylum seekers.
What do we want changed in our current asylum system and process?
Should we stop taking in any asylees? Do we make it extremely difficult for anyone to seek asylum here? Should they not be allowed entry until their court case processes?
What about existing open cases? Should we just close em all? Process them through?
What do we want changed in our current asylum system and process?
Should we stop taking in any asylees? Do we make it extremely difficult for anyone to seek asylum here? Should they not be allowed entry until their court case processes?
What about existing open cases? Should we just close em all? Process them through?
17
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:08 pm to oklahogjr
Sorry, we're full. We can let cuck countries in Europe destroy their civilization instead.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:09 pm to oklahogjr
They have to be on U.S. soil to apply for asylum. Not allowing them to step on to U.S. soil would be a good first step
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:09 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Should we stop taking in any asylees? Do
The asylum program has been hijacked. You shouldn’t be able to seek asylum just because your countries economic prospects suck.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:10 pm to oklahogjr
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/7/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:11 pm to oklahogjr
They are supposed to seek asylum in the first country the get into. Not walk across 3 countries to get to the US border and ask for asylum.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:14 pm to GATORGAR247
quote:
They are supposed to seek asylum in the first country the get into. Not walk across 3 countries to get to the US border and ask for asylum.
I've sent this posted numerous times about is this true?
I know it is if you arrive at Canada first then come to us or vice versa but outside of that do we have any other safe third agreements with central or South American countries?
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:16 pm to LRB1967
quote:
They have to be on U.S. soil to apply for asylum. Not allowing them to step on to U.S. soil would be a good first step
It just has to be a port of entry. My gf did it in Mexico that way
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:19 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
They are supposed to seek asylum in the first country the get into. Not walk across 3 countries to get to the US border and ask for asylum.
I've sent this posted numerous times about is this true?
Yes it’s true. Thats one of the many reasons people are pissed about all the illegals here.
Keep up.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:19 pm to oklahogjr
I don’t know how to change it, but the asylum situation is definitely broken. Holding up a sheet of paper given to you with the word “asylum” printed on it should not be enough to give you a lifetime pass into the US (because you will never have to go to your court hearing in 5 years)
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:21 pm to sparkinator
quote:
Yes it’s true. Thats one of the many reasons people are pissed about all the illegals here.
Keep up.
Link or source for that?
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:23 pm to oklahogjr
Google it yourself. I’m not your secretary
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:25 pm to sparkinator
The issue is fricked from all sides. In her situation going back to Cuba is terrible and waiting in Mexico was dangerous and forced her to give herself up
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:25 pm to sparkinator
quote:
Google it yourself. I’m not your secretary
So you got nothing noted
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:26 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Since it seems like most of the ire around "illegal" immigrants is asylum seekers.
What do we want changed in our current asylum system and process?
Should we stop taking in any asylees? Do we make it extremely difficult for anyone to seek asylum here? Should they not be allowed entry until their court case processes?
What about existing open cases? Should we just close em all? Process them through?
You are what the communists refer to as an useful idiot.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:27 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
So you got nothing noted
No. I’ve got the answer to your question. If you don’t believe it, research it and prove I’m wrong.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:27 pm to oklahogjr
No more asylum. All unresolved cases are extinguished - you must leave. Anyone granted asylum during the Biden years must go back. Anyone that entered during the Biden years must go back. There is nothing legitimate from the Biden administration. When you attempt to destroy the nation, your actions are nullified.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:28 pm to sparkinator
Pass random nobody. I've googled and found nothing except it's not required. Unless there are agreements in place between us and other countries for it such as Canada....
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:32 pm to oklahogjr
After some research folks the only safe third agreement we have in place nearby is Canada so no legal requirements for first country they enter to seek asylum there.
Posted on 11/9/24 at 3:34 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Do we make it extremely difficult for anyone to seek asylum here?
Yes for anyone who isn’t from a declared war zone
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News