re: USSC rules that government cannot make a profit from seized property.

quote:

---

Anytime you see this with THIS court, you know it was fricking bad

---

This shows you the incompetence of the lower courts' knowledge of the constitution. This was an easy argument that the government violated the Fifth Amendment's "Takings Clause" by confiscating property worth more than the debt owed by the owner.

TheConstantineChronicles
@CDO1962
·
Follow
?@SenWarren? ?@SenSchumer?

Unanimous Decision From a “Packed Court”?

“Lower courts ruled against her, dismissed her case—the Supreme Court unanimously sided with her arguments & held that she brought a valid claim under the Takings Clause”