Started By
Message
locked post

PA Court rules property tax-based school funding system is unconstitutional

Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:49 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73119 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:49 pm
quote:

A Pennsylvania judge ruled Tuesday that the state's system of funding public schools falls woefully short and violates students’ constitutional rights, siding with poorer districts in a lawsuit launched eight years ago in pursuit of billions of dollars in additional annual aid.

Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer found that the state hasn't fulfilled its constitutional obligations to students in the poorest public school districts, writing in a nearly 800-page ruling that the state is violating those students’ rights to what should be a “comprehensive, effective, and contemporary” education.

In the ruling, Cohn Jubelirer wrote that students in areas with low property values and incomes “are deprived of the same opportunities and resources" as those in more affluent areas.

That disparity is unjustified, violating both the state's obligations to educate students and the equal protection rights of students, Cohn Jubelirer wrote.

The school districts that sued presented extensive evidence showing wide achievement gaps between poorer and more affluent districts, the ruling said.


LINK

Maybe, just maybe, the schools are shitty FOR THE SAME REASON the property values are shitty?

Does anyone really think NBR and Nola schools would improve if they got more money? The notion that these kids WANT to learn but can’t due to lack of resources is laughable
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84420 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

800-page ruling


Can’t imagine a scenario where this isn’t legislating from the bench.
Posted by martiansgohome
Ankara
Member since Feb 2004
4682 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:56 pm to
Is there historical evidence where simply adding more money to public education in a poor district has been successful in equalizing outcomes between said poor district and neighboring affluent discredits?
Posted by eitek1
Member since Jun 2011
2758 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:58 pm to
The last time I looked, in Orleans parish the spend per child in public school was something like 18k per year.

Just how much funding is needed to be successful? What is the minimum spend per child required?
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53687 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:39 pm to
So basically school choice instead of living in a good school district?

Alabama is pushing that

Private school or home school will be the way
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
12582 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Is there historical evidence where simply adding more money to public education in a poor district has been successful in equalizing outcomes between said poor district and neighboring affluent discredits?


Well sure...you only have to look at Baltimore.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135446 posts
Posted on 2/7/23 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Maybe, just maybe, the schools are shitty FOR THE SAME REASON the property values are shitty?
Maybe, just maybe, school choice would fix at least some of this.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
26910 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 12:10 am to
quote:

Does anyone really think NBR and Nola schools would improve if they got more money?


You can hand chicken shite to the highest paid chef in the world, it won't turn into chicken salad.

Ingredients matter.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62580 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 12:15 am to
Allow me to introduce him to the Birmingham City Schools system. They have all the money you could possibly hope for, but I'd take a small town school with very little resources and teachers who are doing it because they love it any day of the week.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53642 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 12:46 am to
quote:

Is there historical evidence where simply adding more money to public education in a poor district has been successful in equalizing outcomes between said poor district and neighboring affluent discredits?


Because doing nothing is clearly working for them
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
9613 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 4:38 am to


Not a new issue, Texas property taxes have been manipulated for at least the last 20 years that I have been paying.

And it's necessary. There are large tax base divergent issues that are not the result of poor county management.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118229 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 6:14 am to
quote:

That disparity is unjustified, violating both the state's obligations to educate students and the equal protection rights of students,



Absolutely.

And while we’re addressing the topic of violating obligations to the student, being deprived of “the same opportunities and resources as those in more affluent areas” begins and ends where educational priorities are established and reinforced.

Figure out how to legislate the relationship between a mother and father with their offspring and the responsibility they have to one another as such. From there, the issue of equal protection can be honestly assessed as it pertains to state funded education.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
79084 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 6:17 am to
Pennsylvania is a unique animal here. Most rural school districts and inner city districts are net taxpayers.
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2844 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 7:02 am to
quote:

Can’t imagine a scenario where this isn’t legislating from the bench.


Yeah, judges frick up 3 page rulings all the time. I can’t even imagine how much trash is in an 800 page ruling.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7477 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 7:09 am to
In all seriousness, the best fix for a lot schools would be sterilization. We live in a country where the people that should have the least kids have the most, and the parents that should have more are choosing to not have kids at all.

It's a very weird thing to me, but I work with a decent number of people that have opted to not have kids at all. They are high-earners and live a great life, but will leave no legacy. Meanwhile...

We've all seen this movie.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer found that the state hasn't fulfilled its constitutional obligations to students in the poorest public school districts


Oy vey!
Posted by The_Big_Sib
Member since Nov 2022
76 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 7:18 am to
The ad valorem tax of your property is a direct tax on ownership by local government using intrastate commerce as a means to put your property on the tax rolls.

If one was to do a records request to identify the breakdown of your tax assessment (if you demand the returns you'll also find some tomfoolery) most property tax request I've completed look like this.

Schools 40 percent
Hospital 30
Maintain and operating of parish 30

What this judge is telling you is the intention to tax the wealthy or Middle class out of their homes until everyone else is equal.

Purposivism has been going on a long time
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7159 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:25 am to
How many times was Derolph case ruled unconstitutional?
The Ohio Supreme Court issued four decisions in the case between 1997 and 2002, holding that the system that was the subject of the original lawsuit, and the versions of the system enacted by the General Assembly in response to the Court's orders in those decisions, were unconstitutional.

Ohio’s school funding formula, I.e. property taxes, still unconstitutional today. It’s been 25 years.

Let’s keep legislating from the bench.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:32 am to
quote:

PA Court rules property tax-based school funding system is unconstitutional
typical, awful reporting. One must read 20 paragraphs into the article in order to see that this decision was based upon a specific efucation-related provision of the Pennsylvania STATE Constitution … something not even found in the US Constitution.
quote:

The lawsuit argued Pennsylvania’s method of paying for public schools did not meet an explicit standard in the state constitution that lawmakers provide a “thorough and efficient system” of education.
also, a typical reaction. Not one poster above bothered to take the time to read the article and obtain this important little tidbit.
This post was edited on 2/8/23 at 8:36 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38619 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:32 am to
What, the poor districts are short on bucks to pay the local drag queen club to show up and dance for the kids? Poor kids.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram