- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PAC-10 SOS's;
Posted on 10/21/08 at 2:55 pm to MJRuffalo
Posted on 10/21/08 at 2:55 pm to MJRuffalo
If it is TRUE what facts do you have to support that if PAC 10 teams schedule teams like the Big 12, Big 10, and SEC does they would have winning records and be ranked? I'm sorry Portland St., Northern Arizona, UNLV, San Jose St., New Mexico, Colorado St, Idaho, Toledo, Utah St. aren't exactly BCS caliper teams. Pac 10 already plays these teams and I'm not going to mention the Pac 10's record vs the MWC because everyone already knows. MWC is not a BCS conference and when those games were scheduled against the MWC none of them were ranked. Don't act like the Pac 10 doesn't schedule cup cakes. Their already playing them and still can't get more than one team in the Top 25. So what evidence do you have to support the fact that if the Pac 10 starts scheduling pansies AGAIN they would have a better record, be ranked, and be bowl eligible?
This post was edited on 10/21/08 at 2:59 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News