- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

California Law Requiring Women On Corporate Boards Ruled Unconstitutional
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:56 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:56 am
quote:
A Los Angeles judge ruled unconstitutional a state law mandating public companies save a board seat for women, unraveling one of the linchpins of the state's 2018 attempt at increasing gender equity.
A bill requiring women to sit on California corporations’ boards was passed by the democratic legislature and signed into law in September 2018 by then Gov. Jerry Brown. Public companies with headquarters in the state were required to bring aboard one female director by the end of 2019 and companies with five-member boards were required to have two women on the board by the end of 2021. Corporations with six or more directors would need to tap three women to join the board.
quote:
A Los Angeles judge ruled that the California law mandating corporations add minorities and LGBTQ members to boards was unconstitutional in April. Judicial Watch was a litigant in that case also and the lawsuit mirrored the same argument; the case argued the measure violated the California Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and challenged the legality of tapping into taxpayer funds for enforcement.
Forbes
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:58 am to frequent flyer
Awesome. Back to cali "centrists".
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:01 am to frequent flyer
Would this require the state to define what a "woman" is?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:01 am to frequent flyer
Maybe some common sense will begin to prevail again. There's absolutely nothing wrong with qualified women, or minorities, on corporate boards but to force them onto them whether they're qualified or not just to say they are there is just dumb.
One can hope
Edited to add it would be just as dumb to force an unqualified man onto a board just to say he's there to. It shouldn't be what you are, it should be what you are capable of
One can hope
Edited to add it would be just as dumb to force an unqualified man onto a board just to say he's there to. It shouldn't be what you are, it should be what you are capable of
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 9:04 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:02 am to frequent flyer
Good
Equality hiring is BS. Hire the person based off what they have done or the requirements of the job. Hiring someone based on looks is discrimination
Equality hiring is BS. Hire the person based off what they have done or the requirements of the job. Hiring someone based on looks is discrimination
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:05 am to frequent flyer
You hate to see it
But you love to see it
But you love to see it
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:07 am to frequent flyer
Women shouldn't be allowed to drive, let alone sit on the board of a company
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:17 am to frequent flyer
It's amazing that a 'law' like this was even passed. What a bunch of fricking clowns.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:26 am to Aubie Spr96
Please let this pendulum start swinging back in the right direction.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:04 am to DM
quote:
Would this require the state to define what a "woman" is?
Each corporation is also required to employ a full time biologist
Back to top
8










