- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why I’m good with Napier
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:12 am to MEd LSU
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:12 am to MEd LSU
quote:
Napier is a great white shark
Ryleigh is a redfish
You keep saying this but have NO rational basis for such a claim.
You sound like an emotional teenager. Thought you were a neurologist or something?
Posted on 11/21/21 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm talking about his Xs and Os history. He really doesn't have any worth noting.
If you ignore all of his good years, sure. But we're the "propaganda pushers" because we think his most recent success as A HEAD COACH is relevant of course.
You're also just dead wrong about recruiting, but that's an argument I don't have the energy to have right now.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:02 pm to dos crystal
Glad you're good with him... Who gives AF why you're good with him 
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:07 pm to SportTiger1
Have you ever listened to ryleigh all he does is whine
Ryleigh was gifted a great program and not advanced it
Napier took a historically bad program back on the downhill slide after a few bowl games and won 10 games 4 years in a row with a great chance to win his conference
Ready for me to reverse your lobotomy
BTW. I can support others besides Napier I just won’t support ryleigh
Ryleigh was gifted a great program and not advanced it
Napier took a historically bad program back on the downhill slide after a few bowl games and won 10 games 4 years in a row with a great chance to win his conference
Ready for me to reverse your lobotomy
BTW. I can support others besides Napier I just won’t support ryleigh
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:12 pm to dos crystal
That would mean Woody failed to land bout 5 or more guys and we settled on a SBC guy who plays a terrible SOS.
Sorry but LSU can and should do better
Sorry but LSU can and should do better
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:34 pm to Lonnie4LSU
Y’all can’t see the forest for the trees
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:46 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Lol I mean he’s turned down other SEC offers & hasn’t had any set backs as a coach. He is prime to take over something bigger. A perennial top 20 program
That was debunked. SC was hiring Kirby when that “alleged offer happened”. His wife stated that. Then AU is just silliness.
First off NOBODY HAS PRESENTED ANY contract that WAS OFFERED. Did AU talk to him? No clue but I can assure you he didn’t take a hell of a lot less money to stay at USL.
On top of that, ho would want a pussy if he did “turn down” something out of fear of competing against LSU and Bama.
He isn’t qualified O pumping Lester Earl.
Same old shite from fan boys. frick all y’all. Here is what I know:
Here endth the argument and Bull shite y’all keep spewing for this kid:
Let’s have some fun.
There isn’t a team on ULLs schedule that LSU wouldn’t beat. Who on LSUs schedule where they played them would ULL beat?
Bama - no
Ole Miss - no
Arky - absolutely no lolololol - Arkansas would control the TOP and the LOS.
Mississippi st - no not even close if you watched the Arky St and Nicholas st games.
Auburn - no Tank would destroy them.
UF - no freaking way. Mullen would have destroyed them
UK - lolololol
UCLA - nope
ULL would be an 8 loss team with LSUs schedule and at worse LSU may have lost to UT, but would have blown the doors off of others especially because the players would have stayed.
Just retarded to think otherwise.
You can’t compare the 81st SOS with 16th. LSU was 4 until they played ULM YESTERDAY. That’s how bad the Sun Belt is as a conference.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:49 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
Same old shite from fan boys. frick all y’all. Here is what I know: Here endth the argument and Bull shite y’all keep spewing for this kid:
Watch that blood pressure, Pa Pa
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:32 pm to tgdk11
quote:
They had a guy a few years prior show he could win 10 a year for like 4 years in a row
Better to be silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
ULL has its third straight 10 or more win season. The only 3 10 or more win seasons in their history. With the possibility of winning 13 this season if they beat ULM, win the sunbelt championship game and win their bowl game.
Below is the history of ULL since they entered the sunbelt, A real high end program
2001 3-8
2002 3-9
2003 4-8
2004 4-7
2005 6-5
2006 6-6
2007 3-9
2008 6-6
2009 6-6
2010 3-9
2011 9*-4 Vacated 8 Wins
2012 9*-4 Vacated 4 wins
2013 9*-4 Vacated 8 wins
2014 9*-4 Vacated 2 wins
2015 4-8
2016 6-7
2017 5-7
Those vacated wins under Hud are related to one coach falsifying test scores and improper expenses paid.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:32 pm to dos crystal
The only hire worse than Napier would be to rehire O.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're doing this all wrong. If you're going to refer to Hudspeth as "Hud" you have to refer to Napier as "Nap"
Posted on 11/21/21 at 5:01 pm to dos crystal
I’m good with Napier He’s grown on me
Posted on 11/21/21 at 5:30 pm to BayouCowboy
quote:
Like everyone says one game shouldn't determine a coach search, but Napier is a polarizing choice so he will be given no mercy if they lose.
Is he? The up votes are over 130 to 30. 300% more people believe in him than don’t.
He’s already beat the shite out of app state whom you acknowledge is a good team. So if he doesn’t do it twice in the same year it’s a fail? I think not.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 5:37 pm to dos crystal
Does anyone think Napier can wind up as the next head coach at Florida?
Posted on 11/21/21 at 5:38 pm to dos crystal
quote:
Is he? The up votes are over 130 to 30. 300% more people believe in him than don’t. He’s already beat the shite out of app state whom you acknowledge is a good team. So if he doesn’t do it twice in the same year it’s a fail? I think not.
First, 130 is but a small fraction of the board and there are many that are tired of arguing with the Napier Faithful. Second, there are many that agree that "they are good with Napier" as our floor as a last resort. So of that 130, you might not even have a majority of that 130 that wants Napier as their first choice.
I'm sorry that you Napier fans don't like it, but success in the Sun Belt is not equivalent to success in the SEC. I don't think you are prepared to argue that the coaches in the Sun Belt are as good as those in the SEC, are you?
Posted on 11/21/21 at 6:00 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
don't think you are prepared to argue that the coaches in the Sun Belt are as good as those in the SEC, are you?
Well, malzahn, freeze, Bowden, and Jones were all head coaches in the sec and sunbelt. Not to mention rich rod who was h.c. I big X, pac xii and turned down bama, an sec school. Freeze had a lot of success in the sec, so did Bowden, Malzahn played for a n.c and beat Saban more than any other coach. So I don’t think the coaching in the sun belt is as bad as you make it out to be. There are coaches whom have had success in the sec from the sun belt. Just a flawed argument.
It’s like saying Peterson was never a great coach because he coached in the mountain west. I guess fickel isn’t good because he’s in the Atlantic.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 6:39 pm to dos crystal
quote:
Well, malzahn, freeze, Bowden, and Jones were all head coaches in the sec and sunbelt. Not to mention rich rod who was h.c. I big X, pac xii and turned down bama, an sec school. Freeze had a lot of success in the sec, so did Bowden, Malzahn played for a n.c and beat Saban more than any other coach. So I don’t think the coaching in the sun belt is as bad as you make it out to be. There are coaches whom have had success in the sec from the sun belt. Just a flawed argument.
It’s like saying Peterson was never a great coach because he coached in the mountain west. I guess fickel isn’t good because he’s in the Atlantic.
I said the level of coaching in the Sun Belt was not as good as in the SEC, and you have made a list of the best coaches in the Sunbelt that moved on and had success. Napier's record is not from coaching against those people. The average coach in the Sun Belt is not the equivalent of those.
Yes, coaches from the lower conferences work their way up. It can happen, but successful coaches from the Sun Belt don't always work out at the higher level. That's why Napier is riskier than other options.
Edit: Grammatical correction
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 11/21/21 at 7:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm talking about his Xs and Os history. He really doesn't have any worth noting. One bad year at Clemson and then one pretty decent year at ASU. His offensive schematics as HC at ULL have been pretty mediocre.
Jake you keep repeating this but it's wrong. He had a lot of success as qb coach and his first year at Clemson as oc he was very good. They took a step back the second year but it was more Dabo had to get rid of people or he was gone thing.
.as as he did good his one year there and was asked and given a raise to stay, but bet on himself and took ull.
He calls as at ull, although not great stats wise they have been efficient and he has molded to offense around what he has had at qb.
I have Riley and aranda ahead of him and he is #5 on my list but we aren't getting jimbo, fickel, Cristobal, or even Riley and Dave is prolly going to usc.
So kiff or napier....before you say kiff, better understand napier has been way better at ull than kiff was at fau. Also that kiff has never had back to back successful seasons.
So tell us who you want. What's your list?
Posted on 11/21/21 at 8:11 pm to dos crystal
I would enjoy it just to see the melt in Lafayette. I overheard some people yesterday claiming Napier would never take a, and I quote “lesser job over in Baton Rouge. He’s definitely above all that bullshite.”
I’m serious. A man actually said this.
I’m serious. A man actually said this.
Popular
Back to top

1








