Started By
Message

Google's Unicorn: Is Project Ara closer than we think?

Posted on 5/22/16 at 4:04 pm
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 4:04 pm
Been wondering WTF Google was doing and had thought perhaps they buried this for awhile. But it appears Project Ara is closer than we-and definitely I-realized.

What is Project Ara? It's a modular smartphone. It breaks them into smaller, interchangeable pieces that allow for hyper customization based on user preference, cost, size, tech specs, or even the type of activity.

Want to take great photos? Change out the lenses on the camera section. Running low on battery or find longer or power use is important to you? Change out to a better battery. Want a better display? Just upgrade. All of these pieces of the phone are interchangeable and work together.

I've been an iPhone owner since 2008 or 2009 and ever since I heard about Ara, I've thought it had the chance to really upend the smartphone segment. This product will allow lower income users to buy a base model and then upgrade as they go, over time, until hey have a high end version of their phone.

Crack your screen? Don't buy a new phone...change it out. Want to go bigger with your battery but can't afford it? Well hey...do you have some nice upgrade lenses? Let's talk trade!

The possibilities with this type of modular customization of a smartphone are really interesting in my opinion...and the end game for Google is getting lower income users into the Android world more quickly than their iPhone counterparts and an "upgrade as you go," option versus all or nothing luxe brand choices.

LINK

LINK

This post was edited on 5/22/16 at 4:05 pm
Posted by juice4lsu
Member since Dec 2007
3695 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 5:07 pm to
WANT


The last smartphone you'll ever buy...hopefully
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 5:33 pm to
I didn't hear anything out of I/O about it. Did I miss it? If not I think it's 5 years out.
Posted by lesthemadhatter
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2015
1286 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 5:51 pm to
No the developer models will be out this year and the consumer model next year. This is what was said during their presentation at I/O.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29365 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:49 am to
Meanwhile in Cupertino, Apple doesn't think my headphone jack is important and wants me to be some new proprietary accessory so my $125 pair of headphones will work. And forget about expandable memory. I need to pay an extra $200 for a phone. That $12 micro SD card is just not as more better.

FWIW, I've had an iPhone since 3G.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22159 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 11:20 am to
Come to the dark side
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61436 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 11:47 am to
quote:

The possibilities with this type of modular customization of a smartphone are really interesting in my opinion


I'm not saying there's not a market for it, but lowering the cost/difficulty of DIY screen and dead battery replacement would be the bulk of the mainstream interest in something like this.

How have phone motherboards advanced over time? I know with PCs whenever I'd look into upgrading rather than replacing an old PC it wasn't worth it because the motherboard/bus technology was too old to support the latest CPU/GPU/RAM chips.
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

The last smartphone you'll ever buy...hopefully


Nope. The CPU, GPU, cell radios, and RAM are all baked into the exoskeleton of the phone and are not modular. At least in the first model they are trying to ship.
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile in Cupertino, Apple doesn't think my headphone jack is important and wants me to be some new proprietary accessory so my $125 pair of headphones will work.


I missed where Apple is currently selling a phone without a headphone jack
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79104 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 2:56 pm to
This is another Google project which strikes me as something cool, which the average person will have no use for, but which may set the stage for more cool and more practical things to come.

Like the ad for ara. Ok, so I can put in a camera when useful. Maybe add some piece that has an extra speaker. Or add in a health-related thing.

I've already got all that shite on my existing phone. What am I missing.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

elprez00
quote:

Meanwhile in Cupertino, Apple doesn't think my headphone jack is importan


Apple sells EarPods for $19. I bought a tiny Bluetooth dongle for my Mardi Gras Float's sound system for $13. Amazon sells the QY7 SoundPEATS for $17.99 and they are the highest rated BT headphones on Amazon, and they're the best fit and most comfortable pair I've ever worn.

In short, you can Hotwire your current headphones to work wirelessly with your iPhone, or just buy a BT pair for actually less than what Apple sells their proprietary pair for.

quote:

wants me to be some new proprietary accessory so my $125 pair of headphones will work.


What dumbass is able to convince you that Bluetooth is proprietary to Apple?
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22159 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 7:12 am to
It's still not smart to get rid of the 3.5mm.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28703 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 9:44 am to
quote:

It's still not smart to get rid of the 3.5mm.
It will have to be smart one day. It may seem small, but the socket takes up a considerable amount of space inside a phone. It is something that has to be designed around for (IMO) minimal gain, especially considering that there are multiple other ways to connect headphones. The basic tech is over a century old, and the specific size / form factor used today is half a century old... what is it doing in these modern devices? Because it's cheap, it works, and it's ubiquitous. But while it's cheap in price, as I mentioned we are paying for it in space. And more modern tech also works and is nearly as ubiquitous. It's time to put the 3.5mm jack out to pasture.

How it's handled will make all the difference, though. If a phone doesn't have a 3.5mm jack, and you're expected to buy an accessory at 1000% markup to be able to use your old headphones, that could leave a bad taste in your mouth. Ideally the phone would come with an adapter.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I've already got all that shite on my existing phone. What am I missing.



What's missing is rapid R&D by multiple companies who are competing to sell you your next camera or screen or speaker upgrade or some other nifty attachment.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98128 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:17 am to
I want one device that's scalable from phone to tablet to laptop and back again. Motorola had something like this a couple of years ago but the technology wasn't ready yet.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22159 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:21 am to
The allure for me is that I don't have to worry if my BT headphones have been charged or not. I also believe that the sound from the wired is better than BT. How much space do they need in a phone? Could they not experiment with different size headphone jacks? They changed it up quite a few times with USB.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79104 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

What's missing is rapid R&D by multiple companies who are competing to sell you your next camera or screen or speaker upgrade or some other nifty attachment.



Yeah, I get that to some extent. I suppose I just look at that ad by Google and see that all they've come up with is moving around things I've already got. Seems like it'll be heavily reliant on third parties to add value to the platform.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:26 am to
One of the advantages of no audio jack is no longer needing to engineer against interference/static. A lightning adapter would in theory be converting a digital signal to analog outside of the phone. Lightning also provides power if you want to go higher-end on your listening equipment.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28703 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

The allure for me is that I don't have to worry if my BT headphones have been charged or not. I also believe that the sound from the wired is better than BT.
USB to 3.5mm adapter cables exist, but I think the phone has to support it. And obviously any phone that eliminates the 3.5mm jack should support it.
quote:

How much space do they need in a phone?
How much do they have?
quote:

Could they not experiment with different size headphone jacks?
They could, but that would create the same problem that outright eliminating it does.
quote:

They changed it up quite a few times with USB.
And people get pissy about it every time. That's the price of progress, I guess.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22159 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

A lightning adapter would in theory be converting a digital signal to analog outside of the phone.


I must have misunderstood. So they want the lightning adapter to be the audio input?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram