- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
GameBench shows iPhone 6 beats Galaxy S6 in game performance & graphics
Posted on 7/12/15 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 7/12/15 at 3:25 pm
quote:
Apple's iPhone 6 and 6 Plus from last fall beat this year's top Android flagship phones in a series of raw performance benchmarks. However, despite often having a pixel resolution advantage, Android phones also typically deliver worse looking graphics on top of being slower, as revealed by GameBench.
Overall, those tests showed that Apple's iPhone 6 performed best in terms of median FPS as well as in the minimum FPS achieved during testing. iPhone 6 also scored best in "FPS stability," a measurement of how well the device could sustain high performance gameplay.
The firm's full report also detailed that "iPhone games use around a quarter of the RAM of the Android games we tested," highlighting the fallacy of comparing hardware numbers alone, or raw benchmarks without any context or sanity checks.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:22 pm to Street Hawk
Need that hi res candy crush
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:28 pm to Street Hawk
Hopefully this thread doesn't attract the usual arguing, because iOS/iPhone is absolutely the better platform for games. Gaming tests like these serve as a prime example of fragmentation at its worst. Game developers often start with iOS because that's where the money is, and they're able to optimize their games on specific hardware -- or rather a single hardware philosophy, focused on single-threaded performance (of which iPhone trumps all others), and memory management that always prioritizes the most recently opened app.
Then they develop for Android, a platform supporting literally thousands of different phones, each sporting its own special snowflake of hardware specs, native resolutions, and proprietary interface skins. The flagship android phones all have far better hardware specs than the iPhone on paper, but that means nothing if the developer has to strike a balance between those and the low-end cheap phones to reach a reasonably broad audience, just to have a chance of offsetting the costs to develop for Android in the first place.
Then they develop for Android, a platform supporting literally thousands of different phones, each sporting its own special snowflake of hardware specs, native resolutions, and proprietary interface skins. The flagship android phones all have far better hardware specs than the iPhone on paper, but that means nothing if the developer has to strike a balance between those and the low-end cheap phones to reach a reasonably broad audience, just to have a chance of offsetting the costs to develop for Android in the first place.
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 7/12/15 at 4:41 pm to ILikeLSUToo
Do phone fanboys argue over gaming performance?
Posted on 7/12/15 at 5:41 pm to Mr Gardoki
quote:
Do phone fanboys argue over gaming performance?
Unfortunately. I'm an Android person and I just prefer it regardless of benchmarks. I wouldn't jump ship over a phone that isn't that much ahead and will be obsolete in a couple months. That being said, I think Apple puts out a decent product and will take care of it's owner.
Posted on 7/12/15 at 7:11 pm to Street Hawk
Whatever works best for outside sales
Posted on 7/13/15 at 9:06 am to Street Hawk
You have other things to worry about if your playing high gpu intensive games on the iPhone
Posted on 7/13/15 at 10:09 pm to jmarto1
I used to be an android guy, too. But man... The iPhone just works.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 12:00 am to Sev09
The galaxy 6 has a 2k display and 577 ppi vs the the iPhone 6 with its less than HD Screen resolution. The iph 6 + has an HD Screen and scores less than regular 6 with its retina display. Less pixels to push will make for a higher benchbenchmark.
There are 0 games on mobile that the galaxy 6 struggles with. The display on the iph 6 does look cheap and washed out compared to the galaxy. The trade off is worth it
There are 0 games on mobile that the galaxy 6 struggles with. The display on the iph 6 does look cheap and washed out compared to the galaxy. The trade off is worth it
Posted on 7/14/15 at 1:56 am to BhamDore
quote:
The galaxy 6 has a 2k display and 577 ppi vs the the iPhone 6 with its less than HD Screen resolution. The iph 6 + has an HD Screen and scores less than regular 6 with its retina display. Less pixels to push will make for a higher benchbenchmark
You should've read the article. The real-world tests were the parts that matter. Your GPU does not necessarily render at your screen's native resolution if the game imposes a lower max resolution, and that is often the case.
quote:
There are 0 games on mobile that the galaxy 6 struggles with.
It's not about struggling, but rather comparative performance. Games run really well on my Nexus 6 as well. But it's often because there's an intentional limitation imposed, like a 30fps cap that runs perfectly well, vs. no fps cap on the iPhone, leading to comparatively smoother gameplay on the iPhone. Other developers take the opposite approach and downscale graphics instead of cap framerate.
This post was edited on 7/14/15 at 1:58 am
Posted on 7/14/15 at 9:47 am to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
You should've read the article. The real-world tests were the parts that matter. Your GPU does not necessarily render at your screen's native resolution if the game imposes a lower max resolution, and that is often the case.
Exactly. I bet there's all kinds of pixel doubling going on with higher-end displays.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 9:50 am to ILikeLSUToo
It's still a trade off of resolution as sharing from game bench says. The higher resolution of the s6 vs iphone 6.
They aren't apples to apples only real time gaming head to head.
It does not take into account pixels or resolution. Just real time game play
The apple products will win this every time. They are streamlined to operate efficiently as possible while the android market has a broad range of phones to accompany.
They aren't apples to apples only real time gaming head to head.
It does not take into account pixels or resolution. Just real time game play
The apple products will win this every time. They are streamlined to operate efficiently as possible while the android market has a broad range of phones to accompany.
quote:
section, you'd have seen that we cover this question in some detail. GameBench is focused on product testing -- we compare the performance of real products used by real people. We don't do "hardware testing" in the sense of trying to control variables to test GPUs or specific components. Ultimately, we reveal which phone offers the best FPS across a selection of games. This device may not have the highest resolution, but it's up to the reader to decide whether the trade-off between resolution and performance is worth it -- that's ultimately a subjective debate, but one that is facilitated by the information we provide.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News