Started By
Message

NBC Sports Gold Worth Every Penny

Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:14 pm
Posted by mynamebowl
Houston
Member since Jun 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:14 pm
There's been a lot of NBC hate lately for the way they changed up the Premier League coverage this year. Here's a little love for it.

I understand the idea of making people pay $50 for the Premier League Pass is no doubt a greedy move by NBC. But for what the plan offers, it's been money well spent so far for me. The app is great on iPhone/iPad & Apple TV. It's not just highlights, replays, and shitty live games no one wants to see. They have tons of little short videos of classic matches and rivalries, match previews, etc etc.

Last night I watched a 5 minute clip of highlights from the 2004-05 Spurs/Chelsea match at White Hart Lane that wound up 4-4. Next there was clip dedicated to the Keane v Vieira rivalry. The production value is fantastic and there's a ton of content uploaded every day. Really cool stuff. A years worth of solid, in-depth Premier League coverage from a network that knows how to do it right is worth 50 bucks to me. Not saying it's the best option for everyone, but I love it.
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10501 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:23 pm to
you don't get access to every game, right? only a couple of games a weekend?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

you don't get access to every game, right? only a couple of games a weekend?


yea whats the point of paying extra for an inferior product to what you had before for next to nothing.
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10501 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:35 pm to
i don't understand why they'd limit it to select games. i'd happily pay for an a la carte premier league pass if i had access to every game (even if i didn't have to pay for this same service last season).
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:43 pm to
All it does is push people to find other means of watching games either for free or much cheaper
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
11695 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

All it does is push people to find other means of watching games either for free or much cheaper

Reddit for the win!
Posted by mynamebowl
Houston
Member since Jun 2012
1712 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:45 pm to
Every game that's not on any standard cable or satellite package is on the app from what i understand. All the extra stuff you get is really great and should't be underestimated when weighing whether or not the $50 is worth it to you. If you're a fan of the league in general rather than a specific team, like me, it's absolutely perfect.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

you don't get access to every game, right? only a couple of games a weekend?



i thought that only applied to cord cutters. i was under the impression if you had a cable subscription you got access to every single game.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Every game that's not on any standard cable or satellite package is on the app from what i understand.

Not all of them
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

you don't get access to every game, right? only a couple of games a weekend?


yea whats the point of paying extra for an inferior product to what you had before for next to nothing.



I agree it sucks to pay versus not paying, but how is the product inferior.

I haven't signed up so im legitimately asking.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Every game that's not on any standard cable or satellite package is on the app from what i understand.

Not all of them


yes you get all of them.


quote:

If you want the comprehensive slate of matches that has been available through the NBC Sports apps in the past, you'll have to pay for both the new subscription and a cable plan.


You had to have a cable plan last year as well. So that part isn't new. The only new part is the $50 charge.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Reddit for the win!


IPTV for the win win
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

I agree it sucks to pay versus not paying, but how is the product inferior. I haven't signed up so im legitimately asking.


Bc you don't get every match

I tried last week using the NBC app on my fire tv and it told me I had to pay to have access to certain matches. When last year I could watch them all.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Bc you don't get every match



but you do. I just quoted an article stating as much. Unless, of course, the article is mistaken.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

but you do. I just quoted an article stating as much. Unless, of course, the article is mistaken.


I literally tried this weekend. Tried to watch the Palace game and it said I had to subscribe to Sports Gold.

Found it on my IPTV no problem tho.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

I literally tried this weekend. Tried to watch the Palace game and it said I had to subscribe to Sports Gold.

Right, because it wasn't on a network.

You have to have a cable or satellite package AND Gold to get all the matches now.

They just found a way to monetize the Live Extra matches after seasons of giving them away for free.

It's like NBA League Pass. The games you get on your normal cable/satellite package are blacked out (national and local in the NBA's case), but you get everything else for a flat fee.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 2:12 pm
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:


I literally tried this weekend. Tried to watch the Palace game and it said I had to subscribe to Sports Gold.


right, you have to now pay for it.


You said what is the point of PAYING for an INFERIOR product.

I agreed it sucks paying for it when last year it came standard with your cable, but once you pay for it, how is inferior to last year?


Maybe I'm not making my myself clear.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 2:12 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125393 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:13 pm to
Bc the original product was free
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Bc the original product was free



nevermind. i just don't think you are following me.


You should have written "what is the point of paying for something that used to be free". When you called it inferior you made it sound like the pay version did not have the same content as last year which is not the case.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 2:15 pm
Posted by Tigerfan7218
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
14251 posts
Posted on 8/17/17 at 2:17 pm to
Price and Inferiority/Superiority are mutually exclusive things... It's possible to have a far better product and charge less, and it's possible to have a shittier product and charge more (granted not a very good business model).

Just because you're paying for it doesn't make the product worse
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram