Search | TigerDroppings.com



Posts By Rex
ForumMessage
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]Yet if their intention was to offer the subsidies, why did they not initially design healthcare.gov with a subsidy calculator [/quote] They did. I signed on near the very beginning and Healthcare.gov made it very clear that subsidies were available in Louisiana. An obvious question: if ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (2)
Political Talk
re: Even the Catholic Church supports evolution, and shuns Intelligent design - Rex
[quote]Normally I find your thoughts on issues at the very least sincere and well thought out. However, this is perhaps the most arrogant and ignorant statement I've ever heard. Even if one doesn't believe in a higher power, to come to the conclusion that this universe, w/ its infinite intricacies r...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]WRONG AGAIN, Rexy. Gruber spelled it ALL OUT. The language couldn't be ANY F*CKING CLEARER.[/quote] Gruber, himself, and everybody else involved says I'm correct and you're wrong. [quote]I've already debunked your regurgitation of the Fourth Circuit's "analysis"[/quote] You debunked noth...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (3)
Political Talk
re: Will The Level Of Racial Animosity In The US Decrease When Obama.... - Rex
Oh, they're black all right. Black buffoons. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)
Political Talk
re: Will The Level Of Racial Animosity In The US Decrease When Obama.... - Rex
[quote]Will The Level Of Racial Animosity In The US Decrease When Obama.... (Posted on 3/6/15 at 8:56 am) 3 1 leaves office? [/quote] Of course. I can see where your resentment at having a black President will diminish when it's no longer the case. Can't you? ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
Isn't it amazing how opponents of the ACA can simultaneously assert that it was hastily constructed AND perfectly worded? This thread is about the intent of the law, which clearly was not to withhold subsidies from people in states without their own exchanges... that's not just my take but the r...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
Your optimism that MMauler can actually comprehend what he sees is a bit amusing. :lol:...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]He literally NEVER posts anything of substance. His previous account is worse. He's the Rex of the right.[/quote] I support my positions, which is why this and most other of my threads have reached eight pages. Inasmuch as the thread is labeled REX in plain type at its very top, if you bel...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
It hardly matters what label anyone wants to assign to Gruber. He and every other Federal official and lawmaker involved in crafting the law have been clear what the intent was. But, back to the evidence. Here's some text from the law, itself: [i]36(B)(F)(1) requires “[e]ach Exchange (or a...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (2)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]Gruber was the law's "chief architect." [/quote] Gruber was not the law's chief architect. Gruber had very little to do with crafting the ACA, except with initial mathematical theorization....


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (3)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]i know 100% that thomas will rule to hurt the law, b/c he believes that this law is unconstitutional because the power of the feds to issue this law is based on an interpretation of the Commerce Clause that he does not agree with [/quote] That's the point of this thread. That ship has alrea...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (2)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]So far every time you've requested evidence for a claim, that evidence has been provided. Now maybe you can start providing evidence for your argument.[/quote] We had quite a lengthy discussion here a few months ago. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]What do I think? As I’ve written before, I had literally hundreds of conversations with the people writing health care legislation in 2009 and 2010, [b]including quite a few with Gruber.[/b] Like other journalists who were following the process closely, I never heard any of them suggest subsi...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
I recall that now. Dismissed from my memory because everybody else that worked on the law disagrees with that statement and he admitted he spoke in error. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (6)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]You must have missed that whole Gruber thing.[/quote] Again, where's your link where Gruber said that citizens within states that didn't set up their own exchanges would be denied subsidies? I'm willing to admit I'm wrong, if so. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]Gruber disagrees. [/quote] Link for that? ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
Let's see your evidence that the Federal government was attempting to coerce the states by depriving citizens of subsidies, outside of that one phrase. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (4)
Political Talk
re: Even the Catholic Church supports evolution, and shuns Intelligent design - Rex
If this universe were designed there was hardly anything "intelligent" about it. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (5)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote]You have the slight difficulty of the actual architects of the bill saying exactly the opposite. [/quote] Quote or link them. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (0)
Political Talk
re: So, why do we assume Scalia, Thomas, and Alito will side with the plaintiffs? - Rex
[quote] When the text explicitly states the conditions necessary to receive and not receive a subsidy, it cannot be chalked up to oversight.[/quote] List those conditions. Cut and paste them from the law. ...


Jump to Post in Topic - View Entire Topic - Replies (1)

Posts By Rex