| Political Talk|| re: Jindal Drains Medicaid fund to balance budget - texashorn on 2/24/14 at 8:12 pm|
[quote]I know it's easy to villainize the poor as usual ,but Medicaid is not restricted to the poor. Many middle class / working class elderly people are the ones getting much of the Medicaid dollars via shuttling Granny, Auntie, Uncle,etc.. Into nursing homes.[/quote]
... after Granny, Auntie an...
| Political Talk|| re: Can someone explain how Obama can decide on his own to ban US ivory sales? - texashorn on 2/19/14 at 9:10 am|
Well, guess I'd better be consistent.
[link=(http://www.fws.gov/international/laws/aeca_fv.html)]The African Elephant Conservation Act of 1989[/link], along with earlier Endangered Species acts, gives the executive branch, led by the President, power to regulate the ivory trade, up to an includin...
| Political Talk|| re: Lets have an open and rhetoric free discussion about Executive Power - texashorn on 2/19/14 at 8:40 am|
[quote]Presidential power ramped up through this period, reaching it's climax with Richard Nixon, who actually used the Executive Order to freeze all wages, rents and prices across the country.[/quote]
Your premise behind this is grossly incorrect.
Congress gave the President authority through...
| Political Talk|| re: Will there ever be a draft? Would you go? - texashorn on 2/10/14 at 1:04 am|
Just to add context to this thread, the United States held a peacetime draft from 1940 to 1973.
A "draft" does not necessarily have to coincide with active war (although much of this time frame was during the Cold War, EDIT, and yes, WWII, Korea and Vietnam). But not all...
Elvis Presley was d...
| SEC Rant|| re: So Commonwealth Stadium is getting downsized? - texashorn on 2/9/14 at 4:24 pm|
[quote]even during the Fran years we never dropped into the 60s, they were in the 80s those years we were winning 4 games.[/quote]
Kansas vs Texas A&M (Nov 01, 2003 at College Station, TX)
Date: Nov 01, 2003 Site: College Station, TX Stadium: Kyle Field
| Political Talk|| re: Should LSU TAF be allowed to fund political campaigns? - texashorn on 2/6/14 at 4:16 pm|
Since your posted was technically in reply to me, I was only talking about the common misconception of [i]Citizens United[/i] (that it allowed direct corporate political contributions - it does not).
Your fundraising arm is a nonprofit, for which political contributions are certainly illegal. Sor...
| Political Talk|| re: Should LSU TAF be allowed to fund political campaigns? - texashorn on 2/6/14 at 4:09 pm|
[quote]I believe that citizens united gives them the right.[/quote]
[i]Citizens United[/i] doesn't give anyone or any company (public, private, nonprofit) the right to "fund political campaigns."
It gives them the right to fund advertising, for example, that supports a particular political candi...
| O-T Lounge|| re: How are television ratings scored? - texashorn on 2/4/14 at 12:51 am|
[quote]Four of the past five Super Bowls lead the all time ratings index in viewers. Last night was the record event.[/quote]
Number of viewers is a faulty indicator for popularity, I think, simply because the population of the United States grows daily.
Better indicators are rating (percent of ...
| O-T Lounge|| re: 6 gangsters beat up 2 innocent hippies in Austin,TX - texashorn on 2/3/14 at 8:23 pm|
The area just east of Interstate 35 has always been relatively rough (this video is across the freeway from the Sixth Street entertainment district),
but it's being gentrified (and yes, they are more progressive types)... and the natives do not like it one bit.
My advice is to avoid Sixth Stre...
| Political Talk|| re: Homeowners Assoc fines man $1K, threatens lein on home for flying flag in yard - texashorn on 2/3/14 at 5:42 pm|
[quote]I agree, but I'm also amused that the big mouths in HOAs are always petty tyrant pricks who just love to tell people what to do.[/quote]
There is (usually) low participation in HOA governance.
In other words, if folks have a problem with the HOA to which they agreed to by contract, then...
| SEC Rant|| re: Most Recent major championships by conference - texashorn on 2/3/14 at 4:13 pm|
ACC - Miami (2001)
American - N/A
Big Ten - Ohio State (1966)
Big 12 - Texas (2002)
PAC 12 - UCLA (2013)
SEC - South Carolina (2011)[/quote]
Texas also won the College World Series in 2005 against Florida.
[quote]Vince Young's knee was down on the 4th down pitch. Repla...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 10:40 pm|
[quote]Well there's the problem, ain't it? I looked back, and your first post in this thread was a reply to an undeniable fact, not a knock on your school.[/quote]
[quote]So it's a co champ thing and y'all are just like us in that regard? [/quote]
[quote]So is Texas, as the pictur...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 10:36 pm|
[quote] We could have given you the death penalty, but we didn't. Feel lucky.
Oh THANK YA, massa!
Jesus if there was ever an illustration of the attitude that drove us to part ways with y'all, that's it right there
This. All I could do is laugh when I saw that arrogan...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:34 pm|
[quote]I'm gonna go make an account on a Big 10 forum and talk shite about Iowa. That makes sense right?[/quote]
If you happen to run across a Big 10 forum upon which inaccuracies about A&M are being propagated, and feel the need to respond, then haul ass....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:20 pm|
Even taking basketball out of the equation, you were still subject to the death penalty for football violations, and received tougher penalties because of repeated football violations.
That is irrefutable, no matter your obfuscation of the issues....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:19 pm|
Well, that is true. You did not say basketball only.
So what if you are the only institution that got in trouble because of repeated violations in football and basketball? You were a rogue program, top to bottom....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:16 pm|
NO, you said that football was penalized because of repeated violations in basketball ONLY....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:14 pm|
[quote] You have been getting your clock cleaned in this thread.[/quote]
You must live in an alternative universe....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:12 pm|
[quote]In sum, A&M football was the FIRST AND ONLY institution to get a major infraction designation for a secondary infraction in part due to the infractions of another sport.[/quote]
The facts of your assertion are wrong. Repeated football violations following the 1988 probation, which were prove...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:10 pm|
If you have a problem with the facts of my posts on this thread, I welcome further debate.
If anything, it is the deflection of aggies with namecalling and avoiding factual assertions that is obnoxious....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 5:09 pm|
[quote]These factors were important to the committee when the decision was made
penalties in this case. There were, however, other factors the committee considered in deciding
upon the penalties that it considered appropriate. [b]These included the repeated infraction cases
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 4:58 pm|
Repeated football violations within the 5-year time span for which you can be subject to the death penalty most certainly did influence the outcome.
The NCAA chose not to give you the death penalty, but they could have, because of repeated FOOTBALL violations, in addition to basketball.
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 4:38 pm|
Don't be so daft.
There are LOTS of different schools represented on this website, which includes many boards. To think that only SEC people read this board is delusional....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 4:30 pm|
Looks like the football violations that followed the 1988 probation also contributed to your status under NCAA bylaws as repeat offenders, for which you are subject to tougher penalties, up to and including the death penalty....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 4:26 pm|
The harshness of your 1994 penalties were not a result of a single instance. You were deemed repeat offenders because of the previous probation in basketball that fell within the 5 years, and therefore subject to the punishment for repeat offenders, up to and including the death penalty, as noted in...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 3:25 pm|
Yes, all three of my examples involved "lack of institutional control" and a television ban.
Add SMU to the list in the mid-80s....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 3:22 pm|
[quote]But, as far as I can tell, A&M was the only institution to EVER receive a TV ban for lack of institutional control.[/quote]
Maryland basketball, 1990.
Maine hockey, 1996.
Ole Miss football, 1986 (later abated)....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 3:14 pm|
Because that "lack of institutional control" was applied by the infractions committee, and that decision is beyond the purview of the Administrative Review Panel.
If you think the Administrative Review Panel fiddled with the actual LEGISLATION to "get" A&M, you are a bigger fool than I thought....
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 3:08 pm|
You poor soul.
Here, I'll help you. Let's make this simple.
But, it does review appeals of how the NCAA staff or committee APPLIES LEGISLATION TO A PARTICULAR INSTITUTION! EXCEPT [b]INFRACTIONS[/b] or PLAYER ELIGIBILITY!...
| SEC Rant|| re: Question for A&M fans - texashorn on 1/24/14 at 3:03 pm|
Good grief, Charlie Brown. Learn how to read.
Yes, the NCAA passed legislation to put A&M on probation. NOT....