- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WSJ: Kushner says he "inadvertently" failed to disclose 77 assets worth over $100 million
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:38 pm
It just never stops
WSJ
WSJ
quote:
According to the disclosure, 77 assets were “inadvertently omitted” from Mr. Kushner’s earlier form and were added during what the form’s footnotes describe as the “ordinary review” process with the government ethics office. The updated form also provides additional information about 77 other assets, offering more detail about the structure of Mr. Kushner’s real estate assets. Mr. Kushner’s initial disclosure, released in March, hadn’t then been certified by the Office of Government Ethics
quote:
In his initial disclosure, Mr. Kushner didn’t identify business relationships with Goldman Sachs Group and billionaires George Soros and Peter Thiel through a real-estate tech startup called Cadre that Mr. Kushner co-founded and currently partly owns, The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this year. An investment in Cadre valued at between $5 million and $25 million was included on the new disclosure, which showed Mr. Kushner “intended to resign” from his position with Cadre in January but didn’t do so until May. The lawyer for Mr. Kushner said that was “an administrative error” at Kushner Companies, the family business. The filing says the Cadre investment was previously included under another umbrella investment and not specifically disclosed. The filing also shows Mr. Kushner reduced his ownership share in Cadre.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:40 pm to beastieboys
Don't care, got Gorsuch
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:42 pm to beastieboys
Totally fine with throwing him to the wolves.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:43 pm to beastieboys
How in the hell do you think you could fail to disclose so many assets worth so much and get away with it?
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:43 pm to beastieboys
He didn't disclose an art collection and bonds he owns from the NYC sewer authority!
Traitor!!
Traitor!!
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:44 pm to dcbl
Glad we got Gorsuch, still care about this
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:44 pm to TheOcean
quote:
How in the hell do you think you could fail to disclose so many assets worth so much and get away with it?
Give it a few and the PT board usuals will explain it away.
This post was edited on 7/21/17 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:45 pm to beastieboys
:yawnkern:
Holler when they nail him for something.
Holler when they nail him for something.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:46 pm to TheOcean
He is hella rich. That is how. This is absolutely meaningless as this was stuff he already owned.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 6:49 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Glad we got Gorsuch, still care about this
I hear you, but I am at the point where it is all just noise to me
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:03 pm to beastieboys
God almighty Soros and Kushner together being brought to justice would be Christmas one early.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:05 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
He didn't disclose an art collection
Any Russian works?
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:08 pm to dcbl
quote:
Don't care, got Gorsuch
As more comes out this seems to be the fallback answer for many. At this point I really hope Gorsuch quite literally saves the world. We started out with grand ambitions of draining the swamp and burning down D.C. and the corruption therein (I had my pitchfork and was on board), and this point were just happy to have a Supreme Court judge. That's quite a shift.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:08 pm to TheOcean
quote:
How in the hell do you think you could fail to disclose so many assets worth so much and get away with it?
Probably assumed it was okay for Democrats like himself.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:10 pm to beastieboys
Is that bad? I could not care less
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:21 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
As more comes out this seems to be the fallback answer for many.
It's not a fallback. It's reality.
The endgame was to elect someone not Hillary Clinton. That was done.
The next step was securing the Supreme Court spot. That was done.
If nothing else happens, most Trump voters will be happy enough. Oh, and there is this guy named Pence.....
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:22 pm to beastieboys
It was personal art. Rich people have expensive art you know.
Posted on 7/21/17 at 7:24 pm to HailToTheChiz
That's not true at all
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News