Started By
Message
locked post

Will Sessions rewrite the Wire Act to prosecute online poker?

Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:20 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:20 am
Nice article for the "HE WILL EXECUTE THE LAW" crowd

quote:

Although Sessions' comments set off alarm bells among online poker fans and other supporters of legalization, it's not clear how serious he is about reversing the DOJ's position. The Alabama senator said he was "shocked" by the 2011 memo and "criticized it." But it was obvious he had not read it, and there seems to be no public record of his opposition to it.


quote:

Prior to 2011, the DOJ implausibly insisted that the phrase "on any sporting event or contest" does not modify "bets or wagers" and therefore does not restrict the law's scope to that kind of gambling. But the 2011 memo, a 13-page document prepared by the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in response to questions about online sales of state lottery tickets, concluded that "the Wire Act prohibits only the transmission of communications related to bets or wagers on sporting events or contests."

There is nothing at all "shocking" about that position, which was endorsed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in a 2002 ruling that rejected Wire Act charges against the operators of websites offering casino-style games. The 5th Circuit matter-of-factly observed that "the Wire Act does not prohibit non-sports internet gambling." In a letter responding to Sessions' comments, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and six other organizations note that "the OLC memo was not a 'reinterpretation' of the Wire Act's intent; it merely restored the law to its original meaning."


Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:22 am to
Our AGs should not be "re-writing" any acts at all.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:22 am to
Gambling and grass, I'm so glad to see our populace has its priorities straight.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Gambling and grass, I'm so glad to see our populace has its priorities straight.

he's the AG. these issues are directly within his responsibilities

what would you suggest we discuss about the AG?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28525 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Gambling and grass, I'm so glad to see our populace has its priorities straight.


If the federal government hadn't overstepped into regulating these areas then we wouldn't have to be talking about it right now. Who says these are anyone's top priorities anyways? People are able to discuss several different issues at once. Get over yourself.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
66997 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:28 am to
Well, considering that he's not a Congressman, he can't "re-write" anything.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:30 am to
my top priority for the AG is to engage in reforming our federal criminal justice system, which the AG has WIDE power to do

this, naturally, includes many issues related to drugs, because this is the highest volume area of the CJ system

this is much more applicable to the AG than, say, immigration (which is the issue so many have a hardon over)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Well, considering that he's not a Congressman, he can't "re-write" anything.

the AG has WIDE regulatory and interpretive power. this is a good example of that
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26637 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:34 am to
Considering the POTUS will be a former Casino owner, I can't imagine this will be an area of emphasis.

Even if you support full law enforcement, all Justice Departments have their hot-button areas. You can't possibly stress every law or potential infraction on the books.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:

You can't possibly stress every law or potential infraction on the books.

oh i agree. the "you can't pick and choose which laws to follow" argument has no merit b/c of this
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Well, considering that he's not a Congressman, he can't "re-write" anything.


He can't write legislation, but he most certainly can write law based on the authorities given to him. All he needs is a pen and a phone.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
66997 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

You can't possibly stress every law or potential infraction on the books.

oh i agree. the "you can't pick and choose which laws to follow" argument has no merit b/c of this


See, I disagree with this. I think that if one cannot possibly enforce every potential infraction, then maybe the problem is that we have too many damn infractions. If a law is impossible to enforce, then it's probably a bad law. If we are going to let people get away with routinely breaking a law, we may as well not have it.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Gambling and grass, I'm so glad to see our populace has its priorities straight.

Yeah, the jails aren't full enough.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26637 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:39 am to
Unless Sessions is passionate about Marijuana laws and gambling, I doubt we hear much about these issues.

Trump needs to have measurable successes in actual safety based issues like violent crime to prove his bold proclamations.

No one really cares about gambling.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:49 am to
it really helps things if people listen and read the position of Trump's picks and then understand elections have consequences.

and when you pick religious idiots to positions of power you get idiotic positions.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

I think that if one cannot possibly enforce every potential infraction, then maybe the problem is that we have too many damn infractions.

that IS the problem

but the AG can't repeal statutory laws just like he can't write statutory laws
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139774 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:07 am to
Can the AG re-write an Act?
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26637 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:08 am to
While we certainly have too many laws, that is not the point.

Most laws are enforced locally and the decisions on what to enforce are made locally.

Some locales have a vice squad and enforce prostitution and other vices. Some don't.

Some have routine DWI checkpoints. Some don't.

The point regarding Sessions is that, on the federal level, there are always signature issues that each administration enforces. I doubt Sessions makes gambling or marijuana into signature issues.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421296 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:21 am to
MJ is unlikely but i bet online gambling gets rekt (Sheldon Adelson is powerful and buys a lot of influence in Congress)
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:24 am to
Sure but the "too many laws on the book" issue is for Congress to fix. The only thing an AG can do confronted by too many laws is pick what is most important and enforce those.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram