Why do so many of you think assassinations of political threats are far fetched

quote:

---

You forgot Seth Rich.

---

Aka the point of this thread

But no, the killing of a political threat to silence them is complete moonbat fantasy that has never happened before

You could add George Wallace to that list. They did not manage to kill him but I suspect he wished they had. It ended his rise to national prominence that's for sure. The life of constant pain and going from a vibrant man to a wheelchair bound waif was punishment enough for any sins he committed.

You can say anything you wish about the man, but he might have been the greatest pure politician of his day. He was about to cause the Democrat (imagine that) Party one hell of a headache in that 72 convention. Until Arthur Bremer.

Anyone putting out a hit in these circumstances would not want any investigation pointing their way, so they won't send in a team of hit men. They'd do it the way it was done.

You mean like all those dead Russians?

quote:

---

They'd do it the way it was done.

---

How was it done?

Figure it out for yourself.

You forgot Scalia

quote:

---

Because there's ZERO proof?!?

---

There will never be proof if the people who are charged with looking into it have a vested interest in finding nothing.

Cop out? I was just pointing out the obvious lack of intelligence in the post.