View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by GenghisKhan on 10/4/17 at 2:32 pm to BamaAtl
They are actually hard to get, or so I have been told. Paperwork and shite.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by Vacherie Saint on 10/4/17 at 2:32 pm to BamaAtl
Why limit your question to mass shootings?
They are such a small percent of gun violence. Odd.
They are such a small percent of gun violence. Odd.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by SlowFlowPro on 10/4/17 at 2:32 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Every gun owned by the Las Vegas shooter was legally purchased. Same with Newtown, Orlando, San Bernardino, etc etc etc.
which is what makes any proposed regulation difficult
especially when you consider how minuscule rifle-caused deaths are in the grand scheme of firearm-related killings (and if you want to include suicide, it gets even worse). why are we focusing on the extreme minority cause of firearm deaths?
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by Y.A. Tittle on 10/4/17 at 2:33 pm to BamaAtl
Why do you think this this one of the only mass murderers to utilize this bump stock conversion to make the semi automatics basically automatic, if it's so easy to do?
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by SlowFlowPro on 10/4/17 at 2:33 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
But if we make them harder to get, and offer to buy back others..that number will go down.
why would any rational person offer their gun to a governemnt buy back program when the value of that gun will skyrocket?
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by DuckManiak on 10/4/17 at 2:34 pm to BamaAtl
The only “legal” fully automatic weapons are pre 1986 before America stopped importing them for civilians.
To get one of these antiques, you’re going to pay about $15,000 and have to acquire permits through the ATF. I think there’s ~186,000 automatic rifles registered with ATF.
To get one of these antiques, you’re going to pay about $15,000 and have to acquire permits through the ATF. I think there’s ~186,000 automatic rifles registered with ATF.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by BamaAtl on 10/4/17 at 2:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the assault weapons ban of the Clinton era didn't do much
Agreed, it targeted the wrong things and wasn't nearly strong enough.
But proper gun control? Everywhere it's enacted, gun violence / gun deaths decrease.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by SlowFlowPro on 10/4/17 at 2:35 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Agreed, it targeted the wrong things and wasn't nearly strong enough.
classic commentary on the failure of government
"we'll get it right next time!"
quote:
But proper gun control? Everywhere it's enacted, gun violence / gun deaths decrease.
like south and latin america?
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by BamaAtl on 10/4/17 at 2:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
How prevalent was automatic weapon usage in mass shootings before the law?
How prevalent were mass shootings in general?
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by SlowFlowPro on 10/4/17 at 2:36 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
How prevalent were mass shootings in general?
i mean are we going back to the 1934 act? i don't know if we can trust the data from the 1800s
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by BamaAtl on 10/4/17 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
which is what makes any proposed regulation difficult
Absolutely not. That's what shows how absurdly fricked our 'legal' gun laws are.
If the guy could stockpile 40+ weapons and enough ammo to kill >50 and injure >500 in minutes from hundreds of yards away, and it was all legal until he pulled the trigger...maybe it shouldn't have been.
Because we don't really have a black market for them.
If we were unable to get AR type weapons legally in the U.S that would open up a market for cartels to bring in the AR's, fully automatic, with the drugs.
Then we could go on any corner and get them like ILLEGAL heroin and Cocaine now.
SIMPLE
If we were unable to get AR type weapons legally in the U.S that would open up a market for cartels to bring in the AR's, fully automatic, with the drugs.
Then we could go on any corner and get them like ILLEGAL heroin and Cocaine now.
SIMPLE
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by AUbused on 10/4/17 at 2:37 pm to GenghisKhan
quote:
They are actually hard to get
So, by that logic.....making them hard to get equates to making their use in mass shootings less likely.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by BamaAtl on 10/4/17 at 2:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
classic commentary on the failure of government
"we'll get it right next time!"
How about "other people have gotten it right, time and time and time and time again. Let's copy their work instead of setting ourselves on fire inside of this box made of gasoline and wood because the NRA likes to roast marshmallows..."
quote:
Why don't we see more of them used?
Because it's counter productive when actually trying to hit a smaller target(given limited ammo). Ole spray and pray is great when you are shooting and ducking and have unlimited ammo. However, if you are the only one with a weapon, don't have to hide and are a decent shot, picking them off like flies is MUCH more efficient.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by SlowFlowPro on 10/4/17 at 2:38 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
If the guy could stockpile 40+ weapons and enough ammo to kill >50 and injure >500 in minutes from hundreds of yards away, and it was all legal until he pulled the trigger...maybe it shouldn't have been.
i'll await your constitutioanl amendment proposal
also, given that the Contagion Effect likely increases the rates of mass killings, do you also want to ban the press from reporting on these incidents?
our media is creating more mass shootings. shouldn't we enact common sense regulation of it to curb violence?
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by Vacherie Saint on 10/4/17 at 2:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why waste your time on that clown? Her particular strain of mind virus is incurable.
re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?Posted by Giant Leaf on 10/4/17 at 2:40 pm to DuckManiak
Yes there are just not a lot of them
I mean we are talking a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of percent of firearms are fully automatic.
That alone just makes it a numbers game.
Secondly semi-automatic fire is just more accurate in 99.9% of mass shooting type cases.
Machine guns are "scary" though
I mean we are talking a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of percent of firearms are fully automatic.
That alone just makes it a numbers game.
Secondly semi-automatic fire is just more accurate in 99.9% of mass shooting type cases.
Machine guns are "scary" though
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News