- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What % of All Americans have full time jobs?
Posted on 1/7/17 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 1/7/17 at 12:58 pm
I'm sick of employment ratios and everything else....what do I have to Google or whatever to find a simple answer to this question?
Total population 1 day to 120 years old in America
Total people in the US who work more than 40 or whatever hours define "full time"(32+ or whatever)
Total population 1 day to 120 years old in America
Total people in the US who work more than 40 or whatever hours define "full time"(32+ or whatever)
Posted on 1/7/17 at 1:35 pm to Kujo
Here's a link but I did the Math for you.
So basically, if you include people of working age (20 - 65) only 43.5% work full time in a job over 35 hours per week.
This is 71% of the "labor force" which is defined as everybody that wants to work.
CPSAAT01 Table:
Civilian Labor Force - 148.8K people
People not in labor force: 93.7K
CPSAAT03 Table:
Total full time workers working 35 hours or more, 20 years and over, 105.5K
That being said, I find it ridiculous that those not in labor force grew to 93.7K under the Obama administration. The population grew by 7.2%, but those not in labor force grew by 17.8%! By comparison, Under the Bush years, the population grew by 8.6% but those not in labor force grew by 11.4%. The Clinton years were the last time that the population grew at a steeper rate (9.3%) than those not in labor force (8.7%).
So basically, if you include people of working age (20 - 65) only 43.5% work full time in a job over 35 hours per week.
This is 71% of the "labor force" which is defined as everybody that wants to work.
CPSAAT01 Table:
Civilian Labor Force - 148.8K people
People not in labor force: 93.7K
CPSAAT03 Table:
Total full time workers working 35 hours or more, 20 years and over, 105.5K
That being said, I find it ridiculous that those not in labor force grew to 93.7K under the Obama administration. The population grew by 7.2%, but those not in labor force grew by 17.8%! By comparison, Under the Bush years, the population grew by 8.6% but those not in labor force grew by 11.4%. The Clinton years were the last time that the population grew at a steeper rate (9.3%) than those not in labor force (8.7%).
Posted on 1/7/17 at 1:38 pm to ironsides
quote:A significant factor here that you are including is voluntary retirement and how the biggest generation (baby boomers) are reaching retirement age.
The population grew by 7.2%, but those not in labor force grew by 17.8%! By comparison, Under the Bush years, the population grew by 8.6% but those not in labor force grew by 11.4%
Posted on 1/7/17 at 1:46 pm to ironsides
quote:
only 43.5% work full time in a job over 35 hours per week.
Just a random factoid but I read an article in WSJ last week that people in Kuwait work about 3 days per week due to oil money subsidizing their income. Now that oil prices are down the govt wants them to work more with less subsidy. But the people have developed a culture of extreme laziness and won't do it. Who could have guessed that would happen?
Posted on 1/7/17 at 1:50 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
A significant factor here that you are including is voluntary retirement and how the biggest generation (baby boomers) are reaching retirement age.
Millennials recently overtook Boomers as the largest living generation, but your point stands.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 2:54 pm to Kujo
dims lowered the full-time job bar to 30 hrs per week.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 6:28 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
A significant factor here that you are including is voluntary retirement and how the biggest generation (baby boomers) are reaching retirement age.
Another significant factor, after the 2008/2009 financial crisis the largest demographic that returned to the workforce were people between the ages of 50-65, so a lot of boomers delayed their retirements or had to go back to work.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:39 pm to Zach
quote:
Just a random factoid but I read an article in WSJ last week that people in Kuwait work about 3 days per week due to oil money subsidizing their income. Now that oil prices are down the govt wants them to work more with less subsidy. But the people have developed a culture of extreme laziness and won't do it. Who could have guessed that would happen?
I heard a podcast about Saudi Arabia which was about the same story. They are having to face the fact that they must work. Crazy.........
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:31 pm to 6R12
quote:
Just a random factoid but I read an article in WSJ last week that people in Kuwait work about 3 days per week due to oil money subsidizing their income. Now that oil prices are down the govt wants them to work more with less subsidy. But the people have developed a culture of extreme laziness and won't do it. Who could have guessed that would happen?
I heard a podcast about Saudi Arabia which was about the same story. They are having to face the fact that they must work. Crazy.........
it's a lifestyle change, even being out of work for 6 months. takes a LOT of will power to work those 40s when you go back.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:36 pm to Zach
quote:
Just a random factoid but I read an article in WSJ last week that people in Kuwait work about 3 days per week due to oil money subsidizing their income.
This is largely true of most rich oil states - most of their citizens work for recreation, not because they need the money. They have to import scads of Palestinians, Phillipinos, Pakistani and (breaking with the whole P theme) folks from Sri Lanka to clean the toilets, watch the children, do manual labor, work in hotels, etc., because all of that is beneath them - the "work that rich Arabs refuse to do" if you will.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:07 am to Kujo
Here's a chart from 1992-2016 (figured I'd get the booming economy, the average economy and the Great Recession and afterwards). We've gone through the at lowest full-time employed working age population in nearly a quarter of a century.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:14 am to Jyrdis
So 35 hours and you are considered full time?
Most women (50% of workforce) in retail, service and restaurants do not work full time. Kids and shite.
Most women (50% of workforce) in retail, service and restaurants do not work full time. Kids and shite.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:20 am to matthew25
I believe that we have less than a third of the American population working full time. I will find the link but I believe the numbers were about 94 million.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:23 am to Paluka
I have read that 1/3 of workers are now called the "gig" economy -- temp, leased, independent, and part time.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:31 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
They have to import scads of Palestinians, Phillipinos, Pakistani and (breaking with the whole P theme) folks from Sri Lanka to clean the toilets, watch the children, do manual labor, work in hotels, etc., because all of that is beneath them - the "work that rich Arabs refuse to do" if you will.
I suggest they start recruiting workers from Central and South America. They'll need somewhere to go for jobs once the doors to North America are closed.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:55 am to Paluka
"Criminal records. Stricter criminal laws have left over 20 million Americans with felony convictions and prison records — a fourfold increase from 30 years earlier. That background has made it hard for them to get hired."
- Moody's report
- Moody's report
Posted on 1/8/17 at 2:38 am to ironsides
quote:
So basically, if you include people of working age (20 - 65) only 43.5% work full time in a job over 35 hours per week.
It's a little trickier than that. You are considered a "full time worker" if you work more than 35+ hours a week, BUT, that can mean you work two part time jobs that combine to be 35+ hours of work per week.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 3:06 am to Jyrdis
Interesting. So if you take the starting point of each presidency and compare it to the ending point of each...
This post was edited on 1/8/17 at 3:07 am
Posted on 1/8/17 at 7:30 am to matthew25
quote:
So 35 hours and you are considered full time?
Lots of folks say they work 40 hrs a week, but that includes their lunch breaks, coffee breaks, etc.
We worked 9 hours in the service to sometimes get 30 min or an hour for lunch. I was usually at work early and stayed late because I was normally doing the work of two or three people due to manpower issues.
If you work 9-5, you aren't "working" 40 hrs a week.
The dear leader also lowered the full-time definition to 30 hrs so more benefits would have to be given to folks who didn't earn them. Of course a lot of business owners probably cut those folks hours to 29 hrs per week.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:26 am to matthew25
The criminal background checks are leaving the hospital where I work terribly short-staffed. The hiring standards are so strict that they won't even hire applicants for direct care or janitorial positions. Most people need a second chance. Yes, I am serious.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News