View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
re: Way too early Trump v's Kamala Harris Electoral Map (2020)Posted by LSUinMA on 7/25/17 at 9:32 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Even funnier how they think she should be president. Yeah because the last afirmative action freshman senator we elected president just worked out so well...
quote:
Seldom Seen
Be even more seldom.
And it's "affirmative."
re: Way too early Trump v's Kamala Harris Electoral Map (2020)Posted by The Cool No 9 on 7/25/17 at 9:34 pm to SirWinston
Frickin' Illinois.
re: Way too early Trump v's Kamala Harris Electoral Map (2020)Posted by chalmetteowl on 7/25/17 at 10:02 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
And Harris would recover Dems who stayed home in Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. She would carry all three of those states.
you underestimate how racist those former union baws are...
Democrats need a white-ish male with progressive street cred...
re: Way too early Trump v's Kamala Harris Electoral Map (2020)Posted by skrayper on 7/25/17 at 11:23 pm to SirWinston
About the only "out on a limb" prediction is VA for the Dems. Everything else is just a "man, let's see how they've voted the last 4 elections"
Well, and maybe Illinois.
Well, and maybe Illinois.
re: Way too early Trump v's Kamala Harris Electoral Map (2020)Posted by AbuTheMonkey on 7/25/17 at 11:45 pm to skrayper
quote:
About the only "out on a limb" prediction is VA for the Dems. Everything else is just a "man, let's see how they've voted the last 4 elections"
Well, and maybe Illinois.
The state Dem party and the public labor unions are far too powerful in Illinois at the moment for it to fall to federal purple-ish or red hands for at least another decade. Rauner is a pretty damn moderate R who was elected to handle our historically-unparalleled state fiscal situation, and Lord knows that he has tried, and I'd be surprised if he lasted beyond his one term. The city of Chicago is still too large and way too politically powerful for the state to turn federally purple.
That said, I do think there is a permanent realignment on-going within American electoral politics, and the Midwest is turning purple-ish (Minnesota, Pennsylvania) to red (Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa) all across the board, and it won't go back for a while excepting a superb D candidate (like Obama). On the flip side, Virginia is probably purple-to-blue at this point, as is Colorado and New Mexico, and North Carolina is purple-ish and Georgia is turning red-purpleish.
Just the way the wheel turns in our system.
This post was edited on 7/25 at 11:46 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News