Started By
Message
locked post

USA Today: Fact-checking Trump's climate speech

Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:42 am
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:42 am
LINK

quote:

Trump falsely claimed the “United States has already handed over $1 billion” to the Green Climate Fund. The U.S. has contributed $500 million to the fund so far.

The president also falsely said “nobody even knows where the money [in the Green Climate Fund] is going to.” The fund’s website outlines all of the projects that have been funded.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41643 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:43 am to
How many speeches did they "fact check" for Obama. Just curious.
Posted by blowmeauburn
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
7885 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Trump falsely claimed the “United States has already handed over $1 billion” to the Green Climate Fund. The U.S. has contributed $500 million to the fund so far.

The president also falsely said “nobody even knows where the money [in the Green Climate Fund] is going to.” The fund’s website outlines all of the projects that have been funded.


If this is meant to be a "gotcha" on Trump, I'm not quite sure it hit the mark.
Posted by Hightide12
Member since Nov 2012
2730 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:45 am to
I'm gonna need a fact check on 'USA Today'.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

How many speeches did they "fact check" for Obama. Just curious.


Quite a few actually
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:47 am to
It's over.... we are out. Move on
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

It's over.... we are out. Move on


Not exactly what this thread is about but...

quote:

The process for withdrawal isn’t easy. It will take nearly four years to complete the process, meaning that the final decision would not happen until after the 2020 presidential election.
Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3259 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:

quote: How many speeches did they "fact check" for Obama. Just curious.

Quite a few actually


And gave them "true" ratings even when demonstrably false probably, just like politifact usually did/does for the left.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139757 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:53 am to
Green fund's website lists the US disbursed cash and deposited PNs as $1B.

I just saw it with my own eyes.

I could not find any document that accounted for all the money and it's eventual use. I did see the list of projects they've initiated to date.

The truth lies in the middle between your hate of Trump and a Trumpkin's defense of him.



LINK

There is a footnote about the $500M for sure. The footnote indicates that the US has provided that amount. Interesting that there is not a similar footnote for other countries and what they have actually provided.
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 10:22 am
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139757 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:54 am to
The process for exiting a non binding agreement sounds pretty easy to me.

I wonder what the process is for collecting pledges from non binding agreements.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:58 am to
liberal ponzi scheme

check out the good work the GCF is doing
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2975 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 9:58 am to
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:00 am to
As of today, Macron and Merkel are defacto leaders of West - which is OK until Trump is impeached. They're capable of handling it. Macron has been extremely impressive filling the Trump incompetence void.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27173 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:03 am to
quote:

LSU1NSEC


You can't be as stupid as you present yourself on this board. Is breathing reflexive for you, or do you have to think about it?
Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2975 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Macron and Merkel are defacto leaders of West


Yes, 2 countries that combined have less than half of the population of the US are 'de facto leaders of the west'

Where do you people come up with this stuff?
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:07 am to
Does it show all the bankruptcies those renewable energies cost tax payers?

Those subsidies were pure pay back for those that donated to Obama.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:09 am to
quote:

As of today, Macron and Merkel are defacto leaders of West - which is OK until Trump is impeached. They're capable of handling it. Macron has been extremely impressive filling the Trump incompetence void


LOL good for them. I guess you missed the part where Trump spoke the truth about being elected to be the President of the US , not the world.

See folks this is what the moronic left has been reduced to, they KNOW this deal wasn't good for the US, that can't be argued, so instead they argue that "the US is no longer the leader of the world" well sir, if leading the world means entering deals that are bad for us, France can have it.

And that is hilarious anyway. It's like if my neighbors who didn't have guns wanted me to donate money to buy them guns and if I said no they want on TV and said well that guy isn't the leader of our neighborhood anymore. But if trouble broke out in my neighborhood, they would also show up at my doorstep looking for protection because I AM the leader of my neighborhood . We ARE the leader of the free world, this stupid agreement doesn't change that.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27017 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:10 am to
quote:

The president also falsely said “nobody even knows where the money [in the Green Climate Fund] is going to.” The fund’s website outlines all of the projects that have been funded.


Show me ANY "global" organization that is efficient with money given to it AND can account for where the funds have been allocated...

Hell, I would be happy if anyone could show me the actual percentage of the funds that were actually spent on the perceived issue/purpose AND not "administrative costs"...

Its like you people have been asleep through this whole "UN" thing...
Posted by DerkaDerka
Member since Jul 2016
1072 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

The process for withdrawal isn’t easy. It will take nearly four years to complete the process, meaning that the final decision would not happen until after the 2020 presidential election


This sounds pretty dubious. What is it based on?
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Yes, 2 countries that combined have less than half of the population of the US are 'de facto leaders of the west


Well it's very obvious Trump doesn't want the U.S. to be a global leader. He wants the US to be a shut-in.
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 10:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram