Started By
Message
locked post

Trump signs EO on health association rules

Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:54 am
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69243 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:54 am
LINK

Rand is certainly happy. Hopefully it provides substantially more freedom for people's health choices.

Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81280 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:55 am to
M A G A
A
G
A

Let's all enjoy the melt
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:55 am to
In before ATL
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
18965 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:56 am to
Someone give me the cliffs on what this means.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25058 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:57 am to
Something something something rip healthcare from 20 million!
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25058 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Someone give me the cliffs on what this means.


Without seeing the substance of what was actually signed, it was creating an avenue for individuals to join association plans which are exempt from many state and federal regulations because of the way they are organized. These plans don't have to offer some of the garbage that makes exchange plans expensive and they are cheaper often with better coverage options. These products are also able to be sold over state lines because of their exemption.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 11:01 am
Posted by Giant Leaf
On Leaf
Member since Nov 2015
4229 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:59 am to
That a-hole Trump giving us all more choices for our healthcare

Impeach him now!
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83517 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 10:59 am to
I guess it's a start

I don't really like doing it through EOs though

Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139774 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:01 am to
These should be a good exercise on free markets but they will need a few years to figure it out on the fully insured side. If they are self-insured the association members will be able to mitigate risk charges and premium taxes. That can be a saving of 6% or so over fully insured.

The number one problem on the fully insured side will be the lack of data to assign the appropriate amount of risk in order to produce accurate and sustainable rates for the association. With no data, there's no way to underwrite really. Insurers won't be exited about that.

The insurers will have to use "book rates" and add a multiplier to account for the unknown. That alone should make the rates higher than the market. Market being employer rates.

I have some other questions and concerns about this but it will be interesting to see how this shakes out. I'll be reading about this more as more details come out.

In the beginning, I think you'll see them come out as self-insured and then more companies will figure out how to compete on the fully insured side.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73411 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:02 am to
Bamatool will be weeping in his pumpkin spice latte.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9232 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I don't really like doing it through EOs though


Have to or McCain and his clique will vote "no" just because he's not done pouting.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9414 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:11 am to
I believe Rand can generally be counted upon as an intelligent voice on things Healthcare. If this was his work, it likely has some thought behind it.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 11:13 am
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27471 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:14 am to
How long until someone, somewhere sues for an injunction?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139774 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:15 am to
Those documents were ready and waiting.

It's part of #resist.
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22054 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I guess it's a start

I don't really like doing it through EOs though


Had to unfortunately. Members of Congress are too busy trying to protect their turf and pussy footing around.
Posted by AuburnTigers
Member since Aug 2013
6935 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I guess it's a start

I don't really like doing it through EOs though
write your congressman and senator and complain
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Someone give me the cliffs on what this means.

The fatal wound to a dying man.
Obamacare is collapsing of its own illogic, but this act will cause it to bleed out!

People can escape the Obamacare mess by joining medical associations that operate like pre-Obamacare insurance. They can pick the plan that best suits their needs and saves money. Very hard for DNC/MSM Political Complex to successfully fight that!

But it takes money away from the Obamacare free shite and subsidies.

Obamacare overcharging for insurance is bypassed and this counts as insurance so the penalty/tax goes away. The exchanges loose their slush funds but still must give the free shite away! To quote Joe Biden, "This is a big f--king deal". This transforms Obamacare from an "insurance" to an entitlement funded by the general budget.

If it survives SCOTUS, we go back to the old system voluntarily, and expose the costs of the entitlement to normal budgetary processes.

Trump you magnificent orange SOB!
MAGA

Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Have to or McCain and his clique will vote "no" just because he's not done pouting.


Not that you are wrong, but didn't he just rescind the DACA EO on the grounds that it was over reach by Obama. How is trying to fix healthcare in the same manner any different?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17952 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Not that you are wrong, but didn't he just rescind the DACA EO on the grounds that it was over reach by Obama. How is trying to fix healthcare in the same manner any different?


It is only the same if it is an overreach. Do you have any evidence supporting this being an overreach?
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 11:29 am to
Atl's tears taste so sweet
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram